All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of Automatic Classification Methods for Identification of Ice Surfaces from Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle-Borne RGB Imagery

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F23%3A39920302" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/23:39920302 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/20/11400" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/20/11400</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app132011400" target="_blank" >10.3390/app132011400</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of Automatic Classification Methods for Identification of Ice Surfaces from Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle-Borne RGB Imagery

  • Original language description

    This article describes a comparison of the pixel-based classification methods used to distinguish ice from other land cover types. The article focuses on processing RGB imagery, as these are very easy to obtained. The imagery was taken using UAVs and has a very high spatial resolution. Classical classification methods (ISODATA and Maximum Likelihood) and more modern approaches (support vector machines, random forests, deep learning) have been compared for image data classifications. Input datasets were created from two distinct areas: The Pond Skříň and the Baroch Nature Reserve. The images were classified into two classes: ice and all other land cover types. The accuracy of each classification was verified using a Cohen’s Kappa coefficient, with reference values obtained via manual surface identification. Deep learning and Maximum Likelihood were the best classifiers, with a classification accuracy of over 92% in the first area of interest. On average, the support vector machine was the best classifier for both areas of interest. A comparison of the selected methods, which were applied to highly detailed RGB images obtained with UAVs, demonstrates the potential of their utilization compared to imagery obtained using satellites or aerial technologies for remote sensing.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Applied Science - Basel

  • ISSN

    2076-3417

  • e-ISSN

    2076-3417

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    20

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    11400

  • UT code for WoS article

    001095934000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database