ACCURACY ESTIMATION OF ELASTICITY MODULI EVALUATED BY FOUR-POINT BENDING
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F04%3APU47311" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/04:PU47311 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
ACCURACY ESTIMATION OF ELASTICITY MODULI EVALUATED BY FOUR-POINT BENDING
Original language description
The present paper deals with practical applicability of four-point bending in determination of elasticity moduli. In [1] and [2], a theory was derived for evaluation of elasticity moduli by four point bending, namely for materials showing different moduli in tension and in compression, and for thin layers (e.g. plasmatic coatings), respectively. The limitations for reasonable exploitation of this method lie in the inaccuracy of results. As it can be expected, and as it was already mentioned in [2], theinfluence of input quantities inaccuracy on the results error can be very substantial. This is, in particular, the case of thin layers; since the measured plasmatic layer represents a small part of the specimen cross - section (usually less than 10%), the influence of the layer parameters (modulus of elasticity, thickness) on the resulting strain is relatively low. In an inverse problem, consequently, small changes in measured strains or thickness can result in large deviations in the de
Czech name
ACCURACY ESTIMATION OF ELASTICITY MODULI EVALUATED BY FOUR-POINT BENDING
Czech description
The present paper deals with practical applicability of four-point bending in determination of elasticity moduli. In [1] and [2], a theory was derived for evaluation of elasticity moduli by four point bending, namely for materials showing different moduli in tension and in compression, and for thin layers (e.g. plasmatic coatings), respectively. The limitations for reasonable exploitation of this method lie in the inaccuracy of results. As it can be expected, and as it was already mentioned in [2], theinfluence of input quantities inaccuracy on the results error can be very substantial. This is, in particular, the case of thin layers; since the measured plasmatic layer represents a small part of the specimen cross - section (usually less than 10%), the influence of the layer parameters (modulus of elasticity, thickness) on the resulting strain is relatively low. In an inverse problem, consequently, small changes in measured strains or thickness can result in large deviations in the de
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
BM - Solid-state physics and magnetism
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Others
Publication year
2004
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Inženýrská mechanika - Engineering Mechanics
ISSN
1210-2717
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
11
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
1-12
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—