Physiological versus non-physiological cardiac pacing as assessed by Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F22%3APU142244" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/22:PU142244 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.cinc.org/2021/Program/accepted/85_Preprint.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.cinc.org/2021/Program/accepted/85_Preprint.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/CinC53138.2021.9662912" target="_blank" >10.23919/CinC53138.2021.9662912</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Physiological versus non-physiological cardiac pacing as assessed by Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography
Original language description
Background: Permanent cardiac pacing can cause heart failure, with the ventricular dyssynchrony being identified as the main cause for its development. Method: His bundle pacing (HBp), left bundle branch pacing (LBBp), and left ventricular myocardial septal pacing (LVSP) were introduced recently. Their impact on ventricular dyssynchrony was not known. We used ultra- high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) to compare ventricular depolarization in these pacing techniques. Results: We showed the nonselective HB pacing produces the same pattern of UHF-ECG ventricular depolarization as selective HB pacing. Next, we showed the nonselective His bundle pacing in the area below the tricuspid valve has the best interventricular synchrony from all other RV pacing locations with myocardial capture. We also compared UHF-ECG-derived parameters of ventricular depolarization during HBp, LBBp, and LVSP and we showed that both pacing types from the left septal area are less physiological than nsHBp. Conclusion: UHF-ECG is an effective tool that can be used in clinical practice to assess the electrical dyssynchrony caused by cardiac pacing. Furthermore, its real-time implementation allows recognizing between physiological vs. non-physiological pacing during an implant procedure.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20601 - Medical engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Computing in Cardiology 2021
ISBN
—
ISSN
2325-887X
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
1-4
Publisher name
IEEE
Place of publication
Brno, Czech republic
Event location
Brno
Event date
Sep 12, 2021
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
000821955000200