Qualitative Models of Bankruptcy Proceedings using Multi-Expert Complex Decision Making

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F17%3APU125417" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/17:PU125417 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Qualitative Models of Bankruptcy Proceedings using Multi-Expert Complex Decision Making
Original language description
There is a broad spectrum of BP (Bankruptcy Proceedings) models. They are unique, partially subjective, inconsistent, vague and multidimensional. It is therefore often prohibitively difficult to analyse them using numerical quantifiers. Oversimplified or highly specific BPs are sometimes obtained. Their practical applicability is therefore (very) limited. A qualitative heuristic is described using just trends; i.e. There are just three trend / qualitative values used to quantify variables and their derivatives: plus/increasing; zero/constant; negative/decreasing. There are qualitative BP knowledge items in equationless forms such as heuristics. For example – if standard of ensured justice is increasing then level of creditors bullying is decreasing.. It means that not just simple trends but higher derivatives can be incorporated into a model if they are known. No quantitative quantifiers, e.g. numbers, are used in this paper. The solution of a trend model M(X) is a set S of scenarios where X is the s
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)