All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Cytarabine + G-CSF is more effective than cyclophosphamide + G-CSF as a stem cell mobilization regimen in multiple myeloma

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F19%3AE0107848" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/19:E0107848 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-018-0396-x" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-018-0396-x</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0396-x" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41409-018-0396-x</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Cytarabine + G-CSF is more effective than cyclophosphamide + G-CSF as a stem cell mobilization regimen in multiple myeloma

  • Original language description

    Cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is currently a standard regimen for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, cytarabine (AraC) in intermediate doses plus G-CSF seems to have a higher mobilization efficacy. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare mobilization using AraC and Cy. Thirty consecutive MM patients were mobilized by Cy + G-CSF, and the subsequent 40 patients by AraC + G-CSF. Both groups were comparable. The target yield of 10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (for tandem and 2 additional transplantations) was achieved in 98% (AraC) and 57% (Cy) of patients (p < 0.0001) by 1.2 and 2.1 apheresis (means), and by single apheresis in 83 and 17% of patients, respectively. AraC mobilization resulted in higher peak concentration of CD34+ cells in blood (median 238.0 vs. 87.9/µL, p < 0.0001) and higher CD34+ yield (median 28.6 × 106 vs. 10.4 × 106/kg, p < 0.0001) compared to Cy mobilization. Toxicities were comparable except for thrombocytopenia gr. 4, observed in 50% of patients after AraC (Cy 7%). In view of these results, we conclude that mobilization with AraC plus G-CSF is very effective with acceptable toxicity and could be considered in MM patients with planned or expected higher numbers of transplantations.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30205 - Hematology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Bone marrow transplantation

  • ISSN

    0268-3369

  • e-ISSN

    1476-5365

  • Volume of the periodical

    54

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    7

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    1107-1114

  • UT code for WoS article

    000473724200021

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85056829713