All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of bioinformatic pipelines for eDNA metabarcoding data analysis of fish populations

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00647068" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00647068 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60076658:12310/25:43909893

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050214" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050214</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050214" target="_blank" >10.3390/fishes10050214</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of bioinformatic pipelines for eDNA metabarcoding data analysis of fish populations

  • Original language description

    Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has gained popularity as a biomonitoring tool, leading to the emergence of various bioinformatic pipelines. However, comparisons are essential to assessing the reliability and similarity of results. In this study, we compared five bioinformatic pipelines (Anacapa, Barque, metaBEAT, MiFish, and SEQme) using samples collected from three reservoirs in the Czech Republic during the autumn and summer seasons. Negative and positive controls were used to monitor potential contamination during sample processing. eDNA was amplified, targeting the 12S fish rRNA gene, sequenced, and analyzed with the selected bioinformatic pipelines. Statistical analyses were applied to assess result similarity, including the number of detected taxa, read count, alpha and beta diversities, and the Mantel test. Our findings showed consistent taxa detection across pipelines, with increased sensitivity compared to traditional methods. Alpha and beta diversities and the Mantel test also exhibited significant similarities between pipelines. Divergences were observed based on the reservoir, season, and their interaction. In conclusion, the choice of bioinformatic pipeline did not significantly affect metabarcoding outcomes or their ecological interpretation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/QK1920011" target="_blank" >QK1920011: Methodology of predatory fish quantification in drinking-water reservoirs to optimize the management of aquatic ecosystems</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Fishes

  • ISSN

    2410-3888

  • e-ISSN

    2410-3888

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    24

  • Pages from-to

    214

  • UT code for WoS article

    001497109600001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105006632572