Comparison of bioinformatic pipelines for eDNA metabarcoding data analysis of fish populations
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00647068" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00647068 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60076658:12310/25:43909893
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050214" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050214</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050214" target="_blank" >10.3390/fishes10050214</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of bioinformatic pipelines for eDNA metabarcoding data analysis of fish populations
Original language description
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has gained popularity as a biomonitoring tool, leading to the emergence of various bioinformatic pipelines. However, comparisons are essential to assessing the reliability and similarity of results. In this study, we compared five bioinformatic pipelines (Anacapa, Barque, metaBEAT, MiFish, and SEQme) using samples collected from three reservoirs in the Czech Republic during the autumn and summer seasons. Negative and positive controls were used to monitor potential contamination during sample processing. eDNA was amplified, targeting the 12S fish rRNA gene, sequenced, and analyzed with the selected bioinformatic pipelines. Statistical analyses were applied to assess result similarity, including the number of detected taxa, read count, alpha and beta diversities, and the Mantel test. Our findings showed consistent taxa detection across pipelines, with increased sensitivity compared to traditional methods. Alpha and beta diversities and the Mantel test also exhibited significant similarities between pipelines. Divergences were observed based on the reservoir, season, and their interaction. In conclusion, the choice of bioinformatic pipeline did not significantly affect metabarcoding outcomes or their ecological interpretation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/QK1920011" target="_blank" >QK1920011: Methodology of predatory fish quantification in drinking-water reservoirs to optimize the management of aquatic ecosystems</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Fishes
ISSN
2410-3888
e-ISSN
2410-3888
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
24
Pages from-to
214
UT code for WoS article
001497109600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105006632572