Markers of oxidative stress after three days of nanoTiO<inf>2</inf> sunscreen use in humans: A pilot study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388955%3A_____%2F20%3A00537150" target="_blank" >RIV/61388955:_____/20:00537150 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0314898" target="_blank" >http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0314898</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a6158" target="_blank" >10.21101/cejph.a6158</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Markers of oxidative stress after three days of nanoTiO<inf>2</inf> sunscreen use in humans: A pilot study
Original language description
Objective: Recent experimental studies point to a high reactivity of nanoparticles and the potential of sunscreens to penetrate the skin. We measured 20 markers of oxidative stress and inflammation to find out whether skin exposure to nanoTiO2 sunscreen may elevate the level of the markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and urine of exposed subjects, as was suggested by our earlier study. Methods: Six volunteers (3 males and 3 females), with a mean age of 48.0 ± 6.7 years, used commercial sunscreen for three days continuously. The first samples were collected before the test. The second samples were collected on day 4, before the sunscreen was washed off, and the third samples on day 11. The following biomarkers were measured: malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxy-trans-hexenal, 4-hydroxy-trans-nonenal, aldehydes C6-C12, 8-isoProstaglandin F2α, o-tyrosine, 3-chlorotyrosine, 3-nitrotyrosine, 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, 5-hydroxymethyl uracil, and leukotrienes B4, C4, D4, and E4, using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: In the urine, 4-hydroxy-trans-hexenal was significantly higher in post-exposure sample 2, and the same trend was seen in all urinary markers. In EBC, no difference was seen between the mean values of 20 post-test markers as compared with pre-test samples. Conclusion: This study suggests potential side effects of the sunscreen – borderline elevation of markers of oxidative stress/inflammation – which may relate to the absorption of the nanoTiO2, and the non-significant difference may be explained by the small number of subjects. The effect was not seen in EBC, where nanoTiO2 was not found. A larger study is needed, as according to our previous study, the beneficial effect of the sunscreen to suppress oxidative stress caused by UV radiation may be questioned.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10403 - Physical chemistry
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Central European Journal of Public Health
ISSN
1210-7778
e-ISSN
1803-1048
Volume of the periodical
28
Issue of the periodical within the volume
OCT 2020
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
17-21
UT code for WoS article
000620659300004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85093642450