Head-to-head comparison of biological behavior of biocompatible polymers poly(ethylene oxide), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] as coating materials for hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in animal solid tumor model
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389013%3A_____%2F20%3A00531872" target="_blank" >RIV/61389013:_____/20:00531872 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61989592:15110/20:73602595 RIV/68407700:21340/20:00342609
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/9/1690" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/9/1690</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10091690" target="_blank" >10.3390/nano10091690</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Head-to-head comparison of biological behavior of biocompatible polymers poly(ethylene oxide), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] as coating materials for hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in animal solid tumor model
Original language description
Nanoparticles (NPs) represent an emerging platform for diagnosis and treatment of various diseases such as cancer, where they can take advantage of enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for solid tumor accumulation. To improve their colloidal stability, prolong their blood circulation time and avoid premature entrapment into reticuloendothelial system, coating with hydrophilic biocompatible polymers is often essential. Most studies, however, employ just one type of coating polymer. The main purpose of this study is to head-to-head compare biological behavior of three leading polymers commonly used as “stealth” coating materials for biocompatibilization of NPs poly(ethylene oxide), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] in an in vivo animal solid tumor model. We used radiolabeled biodegradable hydroxyapatite NPs as a model nanoparticle core within this study and we anchored the polymers to the NPs core by hydroxybisphosphonate end groups. The general suitability of polymers for coating of NPs intended for solid tumor accumulation is that poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and poly(ethylene oxide) gave comparably similar very good results, while poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] was significantly worse. We did not observe a strong effect of molecular weight of the coating polymers on tumor and organ accumulation, blood circulation time, biodistribution and biodegradation of the NPs.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10404 - Polymer science
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Nanomaterials
ISSN
2079-4991
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
9
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
1690
UT code for WoS article
000580766000001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85093895857