Anatomical theatre or full digitisation? Students’ preferences in field of anatomy teaching
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F25%3AA2603DN9" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/25:A2603DN9 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.viamedica.pl/folia_morphologica/article/view/101602" target="_blank" >https://journals.viamedica.pl/folia_morphologica/article/view/101602</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/fm.101602" target="_blank" >10.5603/fm.101602</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Anatomical theatre or full digitisation? Students’ preferences in field of anatomy teaching
Original language description
Background: For many years, the teaching of anatomy has been based on traditional forms of imparting knowledge, but innovative solutions are currently being implemented on a large scale around the world. The COVID-19 pandemic and distanced learning have influenced the development of new technologies in teaching. Materials and methods: This study was conducted among medical students who studied anatomy in the year preceding the analysis when the restrictions related to the pandemic had been lifted. The questionnaire contained 10 questions with YES/NO answers and a modified 10-point Likert scale. The data was subjected to statistical analysis performed in R studio using the R programming language. 650 respondents were included in the analysis. Results: Students assessed the modernisation of anatomy departments to be unsatisfactory; on a 10-point scale, the most common answer was 2, and the average was 2.69. At the same time, they assessed the accessibility of knowledge to be acceptable - median 6, with an average of 5.58. 75.38% of respondents did not use virtual reality technology, 75.69% did not use a 3D printer, and 92.5% did not work with a virtual anatomical table. The vast majority ofstudents claimed that new technologies will be useful in their future clinical practice. Conclusions: New technologies are still too rarely used in the teaching of anatomy, despite the increasing availability of such solutions and consensus among students as to the validity of implementing innovations in their future clinical practice. It seems reasonable to enable cooperation between traditional and modern forms of learning. (Folia Morphol 2025; 84, 2: 463-470)
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30106 - Anatomy and morphology (plant science to be 1.6)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Folia Morphologica
ISSN
0015-5659
e-ISSN
1644-3284
Volume of the periodical
—
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
PL - POLAND
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
463-470
UT code for WoS article
001598414200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105010101642