Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F14%3A86090213" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/14:86090213 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3" target="_blank" >10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP

Original language description

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used method in multiple-attribute decision making. In the recent literature many authors used different judgment scales which influenced the results and decisions. In this paper the author reviews and discusses effects of utilization of various judgment scales on priority estimation in AHP. There has been studies that have been concerned with the comparison of judgment scales but there were no studies concerned with consistency measures that are needed. Thegoal of this paper is to compare and discuss the application of various judgment scales on the results in particular practical example that has been used in previous paper by Saaty (2003). Thus the focus of the paper is to analyze the impact of using different judgment scales on the resulting priorities and consistency to default scale as proposed by Saaty. Results suggest that judgment scales have a profound impact on criteria priorities but not on ranking of criteria. However, the con

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

D - Article in proceedings

CEP classification

AH - Economics

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2014

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection

Procedia Economics and Finance. Volume 12

ISBN

—

ISSN

2212-5671

e-ISSN

—

Number of pages

14

Pages from-to

"164?173"

Publisher name

Elsevier

Place of publication

Amsterdam

Event location

Brno

Event date

Mar 6, 2014

Type of event by nationality

WRD - Celosvětová akce

UT code for WoS article

000345439100019