All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Attitude-Based Multi-expert Evaluation of Design

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F22%3A73617961" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/22:73617961 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989592:15210/22:73617961

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_1</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Attitude-Based Multi-expert Evaluation of Design

  • Original language description

    Evaluation is an important part of any design, construction or engineering process. The selection of the most appropriate form can prove crucial for the success of the product or solution that is being designed or developed. The selection of criteria, their measurability and the ability to estimate future values of some criteria can influence the result of the evaluation, as well as the definition of the overall goal and the selection of evaluators. Apart from measurable criteria, also emotions and attitudes can play an important role in the success of the final solution. This paper suggests an adaptation of the interval-valued semantic differential method proposed by Stoklasa et al. in 2019 for the purpose of design evaluation. We discuss the process of design evaluation using this tool and suggest its use in multi-expert evaluation setting. We propose a definition of consensus in this context, discuss the issue of the ease of achieving consensus, and suggest an approach that can provide information on the level of agreement of the evaluators in terms of the evaluation expressed as a object in the semantic space. We also suggest a methodology for the selection of the best design based on the aggregated multi-expert evaluations.Keywords

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50204 - Business and management

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Intelligent Systems and Applications in Business and Finance

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-93699-0

  • Number of pages of the result

    16

  • Pages from-to

    1-16

  • Number of pages of the book

    216

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • UT code for WoS chapter