All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Reflecting emotional aspects and uncertainty in multi-expert evaluation: one step closer to a soft design-alternative evaluation methodology

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F19%3A73592869" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/19:73592869 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_17" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_17</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_17" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_17</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Reflecting emotional aspects and uncertainty in multi-expert evaluation: one step closer to a soft design-alternative evaluation methodology

  • Original language description

    We introduce an emotion-based, linguistic, multi-expert evaluation method for the evaluation of less tangible (and difficult to measure) aspects of design alternatives. We build on the basic-emotion semantic differential method proposed by Huang Chen and Khoo in 2012 and utilize the ideas of Kansei engineering and semantic-differential-type scales to obtain inputs and apply the concepts of strong and weak E-consensus. The proposed method registers information on the perceived relevance of the evaluation scales and the confidence of the evaluators’ answers and transforms it into uncertainty represented by interval values. We introduce modified computation formulas required to compute the overall multidimensional-block evaluations from the interval-valued evaluations and define the variability of the group evaluation in terms of the dissensus of evaluators.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Advances in Systematic Creativity

  • ISBN

    978-3-319-78074-0

  • Number of pages of the result

    24

  • Pages from-to

    299-322

  • Number of pages of the book

    369

  • Publisher name

    Palgrave Macmillan

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • UT code for WoS chapter