All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Effect of an overhead goal on landing error scoring system and jump height measures

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F23%3A73614679" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/23:73614679 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2200150X?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2200150X?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.11.005" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.11.005</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Effect of an overhead goal on landing error scoring system and jump height measures

  • Original language description

    Objectives Compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, risk categorisation, specific LESS errors, and double-leg jump-landing jump heights between overhead goal and no goal conditions. Design Randomised cross-over. Setting Laboratory. Participants 76 (51% male). Main outcome measures Participants landed from a 30-cm box to 50% of their body height and immediately jumped vertically for maximum height. Participants completed three trials under two random-ordered conditions: with and without overhead goal. Group-level mean LESS scores, risk categorisation (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights were compared between conditions. Results Mean LESS scores were greater (0.3 errors, p &lt; 0.001) with the overhead goal, but this small difference was not clinically meaningful. Similarly, although the number of high-risk participants was greater with the overhead goal (p = 0.039), the 9.2% difference was trivial. Participants jumped 2.7 cm higher with the overhead goal (p &lt; 0.001) without affecting the occurrence of any specific LESS errors. Discussion Performing the LESS with an overhead goal enhances sport specificity and elicits greater vertical jump performances with minimal change in landing errors and injury-risk categorisation. Adding an overhead goal to LESS might enhance its suitability for injury risk screening, although the predictive value of LESS with an overhead goal needs confirmation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Physical Therapy in Sport

  • ISSN

    1873-1600

  • e-ISSN

    1466-853X

  • Volume of the periodical

    59

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    January 2023

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    115-121

  • UT code for WoS article

    000905987100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85143975525