Effect of footwear versus barefoot on double-leg jump-landing and jump height measures: A randomized cross-over study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15510%2F23%3A73619599" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15510/23:73619599 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399122/" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399122/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.81107" target="_blank" >10.26603/001c.81107</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Effect of footwear versus barefoot on double-leg jump-landing and jump height measures: A randomized cross-over study
Original language description
BackgroundAssessing individuals in their own athletic footwear in clinics is common, but can affect movement, performance, and clinical measures.PurposeThe aim was to compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, injury risk categorization, specific LESS errors, and jump heights between habitual athletic footwear and barefoot conditions.Study designRandomized cross-over laboratory study.MethodsEighty healthy individuals (55% male) completed the LESS following standard procedures (i.e., land from a 30-cm box to a distance of 50% of body height and then jump upwards maximally). Participants performed the LESS three times in two randomized conditions: footwear and barefoot. LESS data were extracted from 2D videos to compare group-level mean LESS scores, group-level and individual-level injury risk categorization (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights between conditions.ResultsLESS scores were significantly greater (0.3 errors, p=0.022) and jump heights were significantly lower (0.6 cm, p=0.029) in footwear than barefoot, but differences were trivial (d = 0.18 and -0.07, respectively) and not clinically meaningful. Although the number of high injury-risk participants was not statistically different at a group level (p=1.000); 27 individuals (33.8%) exhibited a clinically meaningful difference between conditions of one error or more in LESS score, categorization was inconsistent for 16.3% of individuals, and four of the 17 landing errors significantly differed between conditions.ConclusionAt a group level, habitual athletic footwear does not meaningfully influence LESS scores, risk categorization, or jump height. At an individual level, footwear can meaningfully affect LESS scores, risk categorization, and alter landing strategies. Use of consistent protocol and footwear is advised for assessing movement patterns and injury risk from the LESS given the unknown predictive value of this test barefoot.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30306 - Sport and fitness sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
ISSN
2159-2896
e-ISSN
2159-2896
Volume of the periodical
18
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
"845 "- 855
UT code for WoS article
000000000000000
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85166760504