All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Examining the Reliability of ChatGPT as an Assessment Tool Compared to Human Evaluators

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F24%3A50021939" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/24:50021939 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050924025882?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050924025882?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.543" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.543</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Examining the Reliability of ChatGPT as an Assessment Tool Compared to Human Evaluators

  • Original language description

    With the increasing development of artificial intelligence (AI), educators are exploring various AI-driven tools to enhance language teaching and learning processes. This study investigates the reliability of ChatGPT as an AI-powered assessment tool in the context of foreign language (FL) education. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research examines ChatGPT’s evaluative abilities compared to human evaluators, focusing on its assessment of students’ writing skills. The study employed a total of two research samples: one comprising eight students and another consisting of eight teachers of English language at the university where the research took place. The findings reveal that while ChatGPT demonstrates potential in providing feedback, its limitations, particularly in accurate assessment of grammatical nuances, emphasize the need for supplementation with human evaluation. The method section provides detailed information on the data collection process, including the procedures followed for evaluating student summaries and conducting interviews with teachers. The study highlights the importance of acknowledging AI’s limitations and adopting a complementary approach to its integration in language education.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Procedia computer science

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    1877-0509

  • e-ISSN

    1877-0509

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    2332-2341

  • Publisher name

    Elsevier

  • Place of publication

    Amsterdam

  • Event location

    Seville

  • Event date

    Sep 11, 2024

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article