All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher Education: Subjective perspectives of educators

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F25%3A50022409" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/25:50022409 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001083?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001083?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher Education: Subjective perspectives of educators

  • Original language description

    This study explores the potential risks associated with the use of AI in higher education, based on the views of university teachers from the Czech Republic and Iraq. A total of 40 respondents, including 28 females and 12 males aged between 32 and 54, participated in the study. All participants were university teachers specializing in EFL, psychology, ITC, and foreign languages, and they reported using the internet and AI daily or several times a week for their professional activities. The qualitative research, grounded in a phenomenological approach, involved guided interviews that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using LIWC-22 software to identify common themes and sentiments. The findings reveal significant concerns about privacy risks, academic integrity, and the validity of AI-generated data. Respondents expressed fears over data misuse, unauthorized access, and the potential for AI to facilitate plagiarism and undermine critical thinking. While AI is seen as beneficial for personalized learning and language training, there are apprehensions about its impact on the role of teachers and the potential for job displacement. The study also highlights the limitations of AI in replicating human interaction and addressing students&apos; emotional and behavioral engagement. Overall, the sentiment among respondents is predominantly negative, with calls for ethical guidelines, critical evaluation, and the preservation of human elements in education. The research underscores the need for further studies involving larger and more diverse samples, including students, to comprehensively understand the implications of AI in education.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Computers in Human Behavior Reports

  • ISSN

    2451-9588

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    18

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    May

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    "Article Number: 100693"

  • UT code for WoS article

    001495131700002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105005013372