Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher Education: Subjective perspectives of educators
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F25%3A50022409" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/25:50022409 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001083?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001083?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher Education: Subjective perspectives of educators
Original language description
This study explores the potential risks associated with the use of AI in higher education, based on the views of university teachers from the Czech Republic and Iraq. A total of 40 respondents, including 28 females and 12 males aged between 32 and 54, participated in the study. All participants were university teachers specializing in EFL, psychology, ITC, and foreign languages, and they reported using the internet and AI daily or several times a week for their professional activities. The qualitative research, grounded in a phenomenological approach, involved guided interviews that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using LIWC-22 software to identify common themes and sentiments. The findings reveal significant concerns about privacy risks, academic integrity, and the validity of AI-generated data. Respondents expressed fears over data misuse, unauthorized access, and the potential for AI to facilitate plagiarism and undermine critical thinking. While AI is seen as beneficial for personalized learning and language training, there are apprehensions about its impact on the role of teachers and the potential for job displacement. The study also highlights the limitations of AI in replicating human interaction and addressing students' emotional and behavioral engagement. Overall, the sentiment among respondents is predominantly negative, with calls for ethical guidelines, critical evaluation, and the preservation of human elements in education. The research underscores the need for further studies involving larger and more diverse samples, including students, to comprehensively understand the implications of AI in education.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
ISSN
2451-9588
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
18
Issue of the periodical within the volume
May
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
"Article Number: 100693"
UT code for WoS article
001495131700002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105005013372