All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

To Hear the Sound of One’s Own Birth: Michel Henry on Religious Experience

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F20%3A50017213" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/20:50017213 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/opth/6/1/article-p587.xml?tab_body=fullHtml-78567" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/opth/6/1/article-p587.xml?tab_body=fullHtml-78567</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0103" target="_blank" >10.1515/opth-2020-0103</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    To Hear the Sound of One’s Own Birth: Michel Henry on Religious Experience

  • Original language description

    The article consists of two parts. The first part outlines two conceptions of religious experience that can be found in the last three philosophical books of Michel Henry: the first, broad conception of religious experience is connected with the transcendental relation of human self to God as proposed by Henry; the second, narrower conception concerns the story of salvation as told in Henry’s Christian trilogy, and acquires the form of the “second birth.” Yet the transcendental disposition of Henry’s phenomenology prevents it from developing hermeneutical tools that would guide the understanding of religious experience. The second part of the article deals with the critique of Dominique Janicaud, who questioned the phenomenological methodology of Michel Henry precisely because of its religious overtone, and with the subsequent discussion incited by Janicaud’s criticism. The article defends the phenomenological status of Henry’s work by arguing that Henry’s thinking could not be rightly accused from being theological or metaphysical at the time of the publication of Janicaud’s first critique. Yet it is true that the later Christian trilogy identified the general structures of appearing with the inner life of the God of the Christian Bible, and the experience of Christian faith thus became the presupposition of Henry’s phenomenology. The article also argues that religious experience belongs to the field of phenomenological research.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60304 - Religious studies

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Open theology

  • ISSN

    2300-6579

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    6

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    587-605

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85095808664