All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac: Balancing effectiveness and reasonableness of argumentation in the context of the Athenian Assembly of the People

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F21%3A50018676" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/21:50018676 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.20013.sva" target="_blank" >https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.20013.sva</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20013.sva" target="_blank" >10.1075/jaic.20013.sva</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac: Balancing effectiveness and reasonableness of argumentation in the context of the Athenian Assembly of the People

  • Original language description

    The article focuses on the analysis of Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac delivered in the Athenian Assembly of the People in 349 BC. It is a case study of the famous § 24 in which Demosthenes calls for the attack on Philip of Macedonia, based on a hypothetical reciprocal scenario: Philip would attack Athens in a similar situation. The first part of the paper offers an argumentative characterisation of the Assembly of the People. Subsequently, the historical and situational circumstances of the speech are described, and an argumentative reconstruction of Demosthenes’ speech is presented. The evaluation of the speech’s context serves as a reference point for the analysis of strategic maneuvering by putting forward the argument in § 24. The argument is analysed in terms of three strategic maneuvering aspects: choice of topical potential, adaptation to audience demands, and presentational devices.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Argumentation in Context

  • ISSN

    2211-4742

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    34

  • Pages from-to

    315-348

  • UT code for WoS article

    000730127100002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85122342471