Logically Incorrect Arguments

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F16%3A00460750" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/16:00460750 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Logically Incorrect Arguments
Original language description
What do we learn when we find out that an argument is logically incorrect? If logically incorrect means the same as not logically correct, which in turn means not having a valid logical form, it seems that we do not learn anything too useful—an argument which is logically incorrect can still be conclusive. Thus, it seems that it makes sense to fix a stronger interpretation of the term under which a logically incorrect argument is guaranteed to be wrong (and is such for purely logical reasons). In this paper, we show that pinpointing this stronger sense is much trickier than one would expect; but eventually we reach an explication of the notion of (strong) logical incorrectness which we find non-trivial and viable.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AA - Philosophy and religion
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/GA13-21076S" target="_blank" >GA13-21076S: Foundations of logic in the light of new results of philosophy and science</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)