All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Review of S. Centrone, Studien zu Bolzano

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00563980" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00563980 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/b23065-18" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.4324/b23065-18</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Review of S. Centrone, Studien zu Bolzano

  • Original language description

    Stefania Centrone’s book Studien zu Bolzano, published in 2015, is a collection of six German written articles dealing mostly with Bolzano’s logic. Bolzano’s Contributions are discussed in the first essay right from the beginning. For Bolzano, the proper method of mathematics is the method of proper scientific treatment of all objective regions. However, there are ambivalences, weaker points. Centrone points out that Bolzano’s logic is not able to satisfy the principles according to which consequences should be founded in their grounds. Bolzano states the principles mentioned earlier only after he attempts to prove that there are first grounding propositions which necessarily have simple concepts as subjects and predicates. Centrone points out that Bolzano considers “clearness” as an internal property of the ideas, while for Leibniz, it consists of a relation between an idea and its object. However, I argue that when Centrone proceeds to discuss the difference between Bolzano’s and Husserl’s concept of clearness with respect to evidence of axioms, she misidentifies the proper counterparts to Bolzano’s view of axiomatic knowledge in Husserl’s work.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů