How participants in bullying morally evaluate hypothetical bullies and defenders
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F12%3A00387834" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/12:00387834 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
How participants in bullying morally evaluate hypothetical bullies and defenders
Original language description
The study examined effects of adolescents? participant role in bullying and gender on their moral evaluation of hypothetical bullying and defending protagonists. Peer nominations indicated four participant roles: aggressor, victim, defender, and uninvolved. The exploratory factor analysis of the characteristics condemning hypothetical bullies resulted in four factors: Evil Soul, Contempt, Deviance, and Cowardice. The factor analysis of the characteristics appreciating a hypothetical defender indicated five factors: General Admiration, Courage, Empathic Care, Fair Justice, and Cool. MANOVA statistics showed that the evaluator?s participant role in bullying had no main effect on the evaluation of bullies, but had main effect on the evaluation of defender. Gender proved to have main effects on both the profiles. No interactive effects were found.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
AN - Psychology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GAP407%2F12%2F2325" target="_blank" >GAP407/12/2325: School bullying as a process - a social-cognitive analysis of classroom bullying</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2012
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů