Tracing the transfers of raw materials in the Gravettian of Moravia and Silesia
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081758%3A_____%2F25%3A00617098" target="_blank" >RIV/68081758:_____/25:00617098 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00094862:_____/25:10001104 RIV/61989592:15310/25:73627742 RIV/00216224:14310/25:00140502
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618225000084" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618225000084</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2025.109665" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.quaint.2025.109665</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Tracing the transfers of raw materials in the Gravettian of Moravia and Silesia
Original language description
In order to reconstruct the procurement pattern of lithics in the Moravian/Silesian Gravettian culture and to make a comparison with neighbouring areas, raw material analysis from five Gravettian sites in Moravia/Silesia (Czech Republic) was carried out using stereomicroscopy and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). In Moravia, the characteristic raw material economy of the Gravettian was the import of fine-grained cherts and erratic flints from northern Moravia (and Silesia) or Southern Poland. However, radiolarites from the Pieniny Klippen Belt (present-day Slovakia and Poland) were also used and complemented on sites under the Pavlovske<acute accent> vrchy Hills by local (gravel) materials. Elemental analysis has also confirmed the use of Hungarian radiolarites at Moravian sites. However, these, as well as obsidian from Eastern Slovakia, were rarely used. The contact between Moravia and these two areas (Eastern Slovakia and Hungary) was probably less intensive than with Lower Austria and Southern Poland. Compared to the procurement pattern of the preceding Aurignacian culture, the most striking difference is the longer (and costly) transfers of erratic flints in the Gravettian. These now dominated the lithic material even at sites along the Danube River, 250 km from their sources. This probably correlates with organised provisioning of large, semi-permanent sites and specialised hunting.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60102 - Archaeology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA22-05547S" target="_blank" >GA22-05547S: Reconstruction of Upper Palaeolithic mobility through provenience study of radiolarite artefacts</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Quaternary International
ISSN
1040-6182
e-ISSN
1873-4553
Volume of the periodical
719
Issue of the periodical within the volume
February
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
109665
UT code for WoS article
001402288600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85215133832