Multi-decadal improvements in the ecological quality of European rivers are not consistently reflected in biodiversity metrics
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020699%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000028" target="_blank" >RIV/00020699:_____/24:N0000028 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02305-4" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02305-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02305-4" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41559-023-02305-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Multi-decadal improvements in the ecological quality of European rivers are not consistently reflected in biodiversity metrics
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Humans impact terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems, yet many broad-scale studies have found no systematic, negative biodiversity changes (for example, decreasing abundance or taxon richness). Here we show that mixed biodiversity responses may arise because community metrics show variable responses to anthropogenic impacts across broad spatial scales. We first quantified temporal trends in anthropogenic impacts for 1,365 riverine invertebrate communities from 23 European countries, based on similarity to least-impacted reference communities. Reference comparisons provide necessary, but often missing, baselines for evaluating whether communities are negatively impacted or have improved (less or more similar, respectively). We then determined whether changing impacts were consistently reflected in metrics of community abundance, taxon richness, evenness and composition. Invertebrate communities improved, that is, became more similar to reference conditions, from 1992 until the 2010s, after which improvements plateaued. Improvements were generally reflected by higher taxon richness, providing evidence that certain community metrics can broadly indicate anthropogenic impacts. However, richness responses were highly variable among sites, and we found no consistent responses in community abundance, evenness or composition. These findings suggest that, without sufficient data and careful metric selection, many common community metrics cannot reliably reflect anthropogenic impacts, helping explain the prevalence of mixed biodiversity trends.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Multi-decadal improvements in the ecological quality of European rivers are not consistently reflected in biodiversity metrics
Popis výsledku anglicky
Humans impact terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems, yet many broad-scale studies have found no systematic, negative biodiversity changes (for example, decreasing abundance or taxon richness). Here we show that mixed biodiversity responses may arise because community metrics show variable responses to anthropogenic impacts across broad spatial scales. We first quantified temporal trends in anthropogenic impacts for 1,365 riverine invertebrate communities from 23 European countries, based on similarity to least-impacted reference communities. Reference comparisons provide necessary, but often missing, baselines for evaluating whether communities are negatively impacted or have improved (less or more similar, respectively). We then determined whether changing impacts were consistently reflected in metrics of community abundance, taxon richness, evenness and composition. Invertebrate communities improved, that is, became more similar to reference conditions, from 1992 until the 2010s, after which improvements plateaued. Improvements were generally reflected by higher taxon richness, providing evidence that certain community metrics can broadly indicate anthropogenic impacts. However, richness responses were highly variable among sites, and we found no consistent responses in community abundance, evenness or composition. These findings suggest that, without sufficient data and careful metric selection, many common community metrics cannot reliably reflect anthropogenic impacts, helping explain the prevalence of mixed biodiversity trends.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Nature Ecology & Evolution
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
2397-334X
Svazek periodika
—
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
430-441
Kód UT WoS článku
001271363400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85183181593