Attraction of Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) beetles by lure-baited insecticide-treated tripod trap logs and trap trees

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F14%3A%230000864" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/14:#0000864 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41320/14:65784

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2014.944610" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2014.944610</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2014.944610" target="_blank" >10.1080/09670874.2014.944610</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Attraction of Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) beetles by lure-baited insecticide-treated tripod trap logs and trap trees

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The numbers of Ips typographus beetles captured by lure-baited insecticide-treated tripod trap logs (TRIPODs) versus classic trap trees (TRAP TREEs) were compared in a spruce forest in northeastern Czech Republic in 2012. During the time of I. typographus flight activity, TRAP TREEs were periodically deployed and replaced, while TRIPODs were deployed at the start of flight activity, and lure and insecticide were periodically refreshed. The numbers of I. typographus beetles captured was significantly greater on TRAP TREEs than on TRIPODs during the first sampling period but did not differ between the two kinds of traps in the subsequent sampling periods. More females than males were captured by both kinds of trap. Similarly, more beetles were captured in the spring than in the summer by both trap models. The main advantages of TRIPODs compared to the TRAP TREEs are twofold: first, that pheromone lures will make any spruce timber attractive to I. typographus; and second, that logs need n

Název v anglickém jazyce

Attraction of Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) beetles by lure-baited insecticide-treated tripod trap logs and trap trees

Popis výsledku anglicky

The numbers of Ips typographus beetles captured by lure-baited insecticide-treated tripod trap logs (TRIPODs) versus classic trap trees (TRAP TREEs) were compared in a spruce forest in northeastern Czech Republic in 2012. During the time of I. typographus flight activity, TRAP TREEs were periodically deployed and replaced, while TRIPODs were deployed at the start of flight activity, and lure and insecticide were periodically refreshed. The numbers of I. typographus beetles captured was significantly greater on TRAP TREEs than on TRIPODs during the first sampling period but did not differ between the two kinds of traps in the subsequent sampling periods. More females than males were captured by both kinds of trap. Similarly, more beetles were captured in the spring than in the summer by both trap models. The main advantages of TRIPODs compared to the TRAP TREEs are twofold: first, that pheromone lures will make any spruce timber attractive to I. typographus; and second, that logs need n

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EG - Zoologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QJ1220317" target="_blank" >QJ1220317: Integrované hodnocení dopadů hmyzích škůdců a houbových patogenů na smrkové porosty ČR jako východisko pro jejich operativní management</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Pest Management

ISSN

0967-0874

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

153-159

Kód UT WoS článku

000345204700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—