Comparing observer performance in vegetation records by efficiency graphs derived from rarefaction curves
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000166" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/20:N0000166 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X19307848?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X19307848?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105790" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105790</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparing observer performance in vegetation records by efficiency graphs derived from rarefaction curves
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Species richness is a key variable in measuring diversity of ecological communities. It is crucial to get reliable estimates for the number of plant species in space (mapping) and - even more important in the context of monitoring - over time. Therefore, knowledge on error rates related to recordings of species numbers should be considered in such inventories. The performance of observers in four field tests to capture species numbers carried out in forest ecosystems in central and southern Europe were compared. Observer-related species accumulation (rarefaction) curves and derived efficiency curves were analysed, resulting in mean error rates of 29.7% and 39.4% over series of plots sized 4m(2) and 100m(2) respectively. As a new approach individual rarefaction and efficiency curves reveal site-specific and spatially differentiated capabilities of observers to register plant species. Since expertise and individual searching strategies are difficult to parametrise, reasons for variation in error rates remain largely unknown. However, statistical modelling with site- and scale-specific mean error rates gave an overview on important influential factors like location, scale, spatial integration, and their interactions. Our results underline the importance to incorporate specific training and inter-comparison measures in monitoring programs and critical perception of results on temporal changes of species richness.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparing observer performance in vegetation records by efficiency graphs derived from rarefaction curves
Popis výsledku anglicky
Species richness is a key variable in measuring diversity of ecological communities. It is crucial to get reliable estimates for the number of plant species in space (mapping) and - even more important in the context of monitoring - over time. Therefore, knowledge on error rates related to recordings of species numbers should be considered in such inventories. The performance of observers in four field tests to capture species numbers carried out in forest ecosystems in central and southern Europe were compared. Observer-related species accumulation (rarefaction) curves and derived efficiency curves were analysed, resulting in mean error rates of 29.7% and 39.4% over series of plots sized 4m(2) and 100m(2) respectively. As a new approach individual rarefaction and efficiency curves reveal site-specific and spatially differentiated capabilities of observers to register plant species. Since expertise and individual searching strategies are difficult to parametrise, reasons for variation in error rates remain largely unknown. However, statistical modelling with site- and scale-specific mean error rates gave an overview on important influential factors like location, scale, spatial integration, and their interactions. Our results underline the importance to incorporate specific training and inter-comparison measures in monitoring programs and critical perception of results on temporal changes of species richness.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40102 - Forestry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ecological Indicators
ISSN
1470-160X
e-ISSN
1872-7034
Svazek periodika
109
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
FEB 2020
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
105790
Kód UT WoS článku
000500940400016
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—