Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Urban climatological research informing environmental policy and planning in Fukuoka, Japan: What makes an epistemic community successful locally?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000001" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/25:N0000001 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60460709:41320/24:100345 RIV/60460709:41320/25:N0000004

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2139" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2139</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.2139" target="_blank" >10.1002/eet.2139</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Urban climatological research informing environmental policy and planning in Fukuoka, Japan: What makes an epistemic community successful locally?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Interest in knowledge politics driving urban environmental policy is growing. The aim of this paper is to assess the conditions that enable an epistemic community of experts to influence policy in a specific locality. We evaluate an epistemic community of urban climatology researchers in Fukuoka, Japan, who have successfully engaged with local policy despite documented knowledge circulation failures for urban climatology elsewhere. The research is based on a process tracing-derived methodology, analysing archival and documentary sources. Its results show the epistemic community has conducted observational and modelling-based research in Fukuoka over decades, networking with peers across Japan and globally and making recommendations for policy interventions locally through government expert committees and collaborative projects. These findings reflect the importance of professionalisation and modes of persuasion – especially visuals, such as maps showing heat islands – in explaining how epistemic communities come to be effective. We argue, however, that institutions constitute epistemic communities as well as individuals. The conclusions display, however, that even if an epistemic community is effective in influencing policy, this will not necessarily translate into practical interventions in the built environment. Understanding how epistemic communities define and measure their own ‘success’ is thus an area for future research.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Urban climatological research informing environmental policy and planning in Fukuoka, Japan: What makes an epistemic community successful locally?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Interest in knowledge politics driving urban environmental policy is growing. The aim of this paper is to assess the conditions that enable an epistemic community of experts to influence policy in a specific locality. We evaluate an epistemic community of urban climatology researchers in Fukuoka, Japan, who have successfully engaged with local policy despite documented knowledge circulation failures for urban climatology elsewhere. The research is based on a process tracing-derived methodology, analysing archival and documentary sources. Its results show the epistemic community has conducted observational and modelling-based research in Fukuoka over decades, networking with peers across Japan and globally and making recommendations for policy interventions locally through government expert committees and collaborative projects. These findings reflect the importance of professionalisation and modes of persuasion – especially visuals, such as maps showing heat islands – in explaining how epistemic communities come to be effective. We argue, however, that institutions constitute epistemic communities as well as individuals. The conclusions display, however, that even if an epistemic community is effective in influencing policy, this will not necessarily translate into practical interventions in the built environment. Understanding how epistemic communities define and measure their own ‘success’ is thus an area for future research.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Environmental Policy and Governance

  • ISSN

    1756-932X

  • e-ISSN

    1756-9338

  • Svazek periodika

    35

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    16

  • Strana od-do

    246-261

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001360593100001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85209899652