Commentary on the article "Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application" by Liu et al. (DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112225)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020711%3A_____%2F24%3A10155189" target="_blank" >RIV/00020711:_____/24:10155189 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010744" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010744</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112617" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112617</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Commentary on the article "Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application" by Liu et al. (DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112225)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The recently published article &quot;Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application&quot; (Liu et al., 2024) contains a number of ambiguities and imprecisions, which could be described as errors in the use of the water footprint (WF) methodology, and thus, the presented results are not correct, respectively do not capture human appropriation of water resource use as explained and justified by the concept developers. At the same time, the article introduces the concept of the so-called blue-grey water footprint. In this contribution, first, the ambiguities in the published article, which probably stem from a misinterpretation of the WF concept, are critically discussed. Then, the &quot;blue-grey water footprint&quot; introduced is reviewed and further discussed, especially regarding its inconsistency with the principles of the WF concept introduced in the Water Footprint Assessment Manual by Hoekstra et al. (2011). This commentary focuses on the major flaws and discusses the most relevant shortcomings of this article.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Commentary on the article "Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application" by Liu et al. (DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112225)

Popis výsledku anglicky

The recently published article &quot;Overestimation of water pressure by traditional water footprint: Method revision and application&quot; (Liu et al., 2024) contains a number of ambiguities and imprecisions, which could be described as errors in the use of the water footprint (WF) methodology, and thus, the presented results are not correct, respectively do not capture human appropriation of water resource use as explained and justified by the concept developers. At the same time, the article introduces the concept of the so-called blue-grey water footprint. In this contribution, first, the ambiguities in the published article, which probably stem from a misinterpretation of the WF concept, are critically discussed. Then, the &quot;blue-grey water footprint&quot; introduced is reviewed and further discussed, especially regarding its inconsistency with the principles of the WF concept introduced in the Water Footprint Assessment Manual by Hoekstra et al. (2011). This commentary focuses on the major flaws and discusses the most relevant shortcomings of this article.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10503 - Water resources

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ecological Indicators

ISSN

1470-160X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

167

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

září

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

3

Strana od-do

112617

Kód UT WoS článku

001318024000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85203986482