Evropské směrnice pro prevenci kardiovaskulárních onemocnění v klinické praxi: třetí společná pracovní skupina evropské a dalších společností pro prevenci kardiovaskulárních onemocnění v klinické praxi

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F03%3A00000931" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/03:00000931 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

European guideline on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: third joint task force of European and other societies on cardiovascular disease preventtion in clinical practice

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Preamble: Guidelines and Expert Consensus documents aim to present all the relevant evidence on a particular issue in order to help physicians to weigh the benefits and risks of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. They should be helpful ineveryday clinical decision-making. A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by different organisations, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and by other related societies. By means of links to websites of National Societies several hundred guidelines are available. This profusion can put at stake the authority and validity of guidelines, which can only be guaranteed if they have been developed by an unquestionable decision-making process. This isone of the reasons why the ESC and others have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents. In spite of the fact that standards for issuing good quality Guidelines and Expert Consensus Doc

Název v anglickém jazyce

European guideline on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: third joint task force of European and other societies on cardiovascular disease preventtion in clinical practice

Popis výsledku anglicky

Preamble: Guidelines and Expert Consensus documents aim to present all the relevant evidence on a particular issue in order to help physicians to weigh the benefits and risks of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. They should be helpful ineveryday clinical decision-making. A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by different organisations, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and by other related societies. By means of links to websites of National Societies several hundred guidelines are available. This profusion can put at stake the authority and validity of guidelines, which can only be guaranteed if they have been developed by an unquestionable decision-making process. This isone of the reasons why the ESC and others have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents. In spite of the fact that standards for issuing good quality Guidelines and Expert Consensus Doc

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2003

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation

ISSN

1741-8267

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

suppl. 1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

78

Strana od-do

"S1"-"S78"

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—