Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F12%3A00055975" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/12:00055975 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x/pdf" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x/pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x" target="_blank" >10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Recipients of extended-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long-term outcomes compared to standard-criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3-year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned(1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty-three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacept-treated versus cyclosporine-treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine-treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5) than belatacept-treated patients (2730%). Acute rejection rates were similar between groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence was higher in belatacept-treated
Název v anglickém jazyce
Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys
Popis výsledku anglicky
Recipients of extended-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long-term outcomes compared to standard-criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3-year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned(1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty-three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacept-treated versus cyclosporine-treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine-treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5) than belatacept-treated patients (2730%). Acute rejection rates were similar between groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence was higher in belatacept-treated
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FE - Ostatní obory vnitřního lékařství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
American journal of transplantation
ISSN
1600-6135
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
630-639
Kód UT WoS článku
000300832500020
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—