Postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without intra-aortic balloon pump

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F22%3A00083488" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/22:00083488 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1053077022001173?token=3CC3969287341A34230F4C9D14597752BDB00D0C692502C975302B5BAFD5255442E7A6E7AAFA624A47E42C6BEA6D9A48&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20230110074002" target="_blank" >https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1053077022001173?token=3CC3969287341A34230F4C9D14597752BDB00D0C692502C975302B5BAFD5255442E7A6E7AAFA624A47E42C6BEA6D9A48&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20230110074002</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.006" target="_blank" >10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.006</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without intra-aortic balloon pump

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of patients with postcardiotomy shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) only compared with VA-ECMO and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Design: A retrospective multicenter registry study. Setting: At 19 cardiac surgery units. Participants: A total of 615 adult patients who required VA-ECMO from 2010 to 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received VA-ECMO only (ECMO only group) or VA-ECMO plus IABP (ECMO-IABP group). Measurements and Main Results: The overall series mean age was 63 +/- 13 years, and 33% were female. The ECMO-only group included 499 patients, and 116 patients were in the ECMO-IABP group. Urgent and/or emergent procedures were more common in the ECMO-only group. Central cannulation was performed in 47% (n = 54) in the ECMO-IABP group compared to 27% (n = 132) in the ECMO-only group. In the ECMOIABP group, 58% (n = 67) were successfully weaned from ECMO, compared to 46% (n = 231) in the ECMO-only group (p = 0.026). However, inhospital mortality was 63% in the ECMO-IABP group compared to 65% in the ECMO-only group (p = 0.66). Among 114 propensity score-matched pairs, ECMO-IABP group had comparable weaning rates (57% v 53%, p = 0.51) and in-hospital mortality (64% v 58%, p = 0.78). Conclusions: This multicenter study showed that adjunctive IABP did not translate into better outcomes in patients treated with VA-ECMO for postcardiotomy shock. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without intra-aortic balloon pump

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of patients with postcardiotomy shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) only compared with VA-ECMO and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Design: A retrospective multicenter registry study. Setting: At 19 cardiac surgery units. Participants: A total of 615 adult patients who required VA-ECMO from 2010 to 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received VA-ECMO only (ECMO only group) or VA-ECMO plus IABP (ECMO-IABP group). Measurements and Main Results: The overall series mean age was 63 +/- 13 years, and 33% were female. The ECMO-only group included 499 patients, and 116 patients were in the ECMO-IABP group. Urgent and/or emergent procedures were more common in the ECMO-only group. Central cannulation was performed in 47% (n = 54) in the ECMO-IABP group compared to 27% (n = 132) in the ECMO-only group. In the ECMOIABP group, 58% (n = 67) were successfully weaned from ECMO, compared to 46% (n = 231) in the ECMO-only group (p = 0.026). However, inhospital mortality was 63% in the ECMO-IABP group compared to 65% in the ECMO-only group (p = 0.66). Among 114 propensity score-matched pairs, ECMO-IABP group had comparable weaning rates (57% v 53%, p = 0.51) and in-hospital mortality (64% v 58%, p = 0.78). Conclusions: This multicenter study showed that adjunctive IABP did not translate into better outcomes in patients treated with VA-ECMO for postcardiotomy shock. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia

ISSN

1053-0770

e-ISSN

1532-8422

Svazek periodika

36

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

2876-2883

Kód UT WoS článku

000885120800007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85126560459