Beck Depression Inventory-II: Self-report or interview-based administrations show different results in older persons

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F19%3A43919498" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/19:43919498 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics/article/beck-depression-inventoryii-selfreport-or-interviewbased-administrations-show-different-results-in-older-persons/DBA93C0B7E8FCC4BCBB7D38A0FE79B1A" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics/article/beck-depression-inventoryii-selfreport-or-interviewbased-administrations-show-different-results-in-older-persons/DBA93C0B7E8FCC4BCBB7D38A0FE79B1A</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610218001187" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1041610218001187</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Beck Depression Inventory-II: Self-report or interview-based administrations show different results in older persons

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is one of the most-used rating scales. It was developed as a tool administered either as a self-rating or interview-based, observer-rating scale. Objective: The goal of this study is to compare BDI-II scores obtained with two standard methods of administration in community-based older persons. Methods: BDI-II was administered at first in the self-rated version to a sample of 60 mentally healthy older persons (age 60–87 years). Afterward, the interview-based administration was performed. Analyses: We compared the scores with nonparametric tests — Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. We also computed internal consistency. Results: Self-rated BDI-II yielded significantly higher total score than interview (p &lt; 0.001, P = 88%). The correlation between total scores was moderate (rs = 0.46, p &lt; 0.001). Item analysis revealed a larger decrease (lower scores) in the somatic items in the interview-based version. Conclusions: The two methods of administration result in different total score in healthy older persons. Therefore, interpretation of the scores should reflect the administration, which should be always specified in the studies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Beck Depression Inventory-II: Self-report or interview-based administrations show different results in older persons

Popis výsledku anglicky

Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is one of the most-used rating scales. It was developed as a tool administered either as a self-rating or interview-based, observer-rating scale. Objective: The goal of this study is to compare BDI-II scores obtained with two standard methods of administration in community-based older persons. Methods: BDI-II was administered at first in the self-rated version to a sample of 60 mentally healthy older persons (age 60–87 years). Afterward, the interview-based administration was performed. Analyses: We compared the scores with nonparametric tests — Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. We also computed internal consistency. Results: Self-rated BDI-II yielded significantly higher total score than interview (p &lt; 0.001, P = 88%). The correlation between total scores was moderate (rs = 0.46, p &lt; 0.001). Item analysis revealed a larger decrease (lower scores) in the somatic items in the interview-based version. Conclusions: The two methods of administration result in different total score in healthy older persons. Therefore, interpretation of the scores should reflect the administration, which should be always specified in the studies.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50102 - Psychology, special (including therapy for learning, speech, hearing, visual and other physical and mental disabilities);

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Psychogeriatrics

ISSN

1041-6102

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

735-742

Kód UT WoS článku

000472197800012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85055289555