Typicality of functional connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs‐fMRI across datasets, atlases, and preprocessing pipelines
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F20%3A43920297" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/20:43920297 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21230/20:00345914 RIV/00023001:_____/20:00080324 RIV/60461373:22340/20:43926020
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.25195" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.25195</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25195" target="_blank" >10.1002/hbm.25195</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Typicality of functional connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs‐fMRI across datasets, atlases, and preprocessing pipelines
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Functional connectivity analysis of resting-state fMRI data has recently become one of the most common approaches to characterizing individual brain function. It has been widely suggested that the functional connectivity matrix is a useful approximate representation of the brain's connectivity, potentially providing behaviorally or clinically relevant markers. However, functional connectivity estimates are known to be detrimentally affected by various artifacts, including those due to in-scanner head motion. Moreover, as individual functional connections generally covary only very weakly with head motion estimates, motion influence is difficult to quantify robustly, and prone to be neglected in practice. Although the use of individual estimates of head motion, or group-level correlation of motion and functional connectivity has been suggested, a sufficiently sensitive measure of individual functional connectivity quality has not yet been established. We propose a new intuitive summary index, Typicality of Functional Connectivity, to capture deviations from standard brain functional connectivity patterns. In a resting-state fMRI dataset of 245 healthy subjects, this measure was significantly correlated with individual head motion metrics. The results were further robustly reproduced across atlas granularity, preprocessing options, and other datasets, including 1,081 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. In principle, Typicality of Functional Connectivity should be sensitive also to other types of artifacts, processing errors, and possibly also brain pathology, allowing extensive use in data quality screening and quantification in functional connectivity studies as well as methodological investigations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Typicality of functional connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs‐fMRI across datasets, atlases, and preprocessing pipelines
Popis výsledku anglicky
Functional connectivity analysis of resting-state fMRI data has recently become one of the most common approaches to characterizing individual brain function. It has been widely suggested that the functional connectivity matrix is a useful approximate representation of the brain's connectivity, potentially providing behaviorally or clinically relevant markers. However, functional connectivity estimates are known to be detrimentally affected by various artifacts, including those due to in-scanner head motion. Moreover, as individual functional connections generally covary only very weakly with head motion estimates, motion influence is difficult to quantify robustly, and prone to be neglected in practice. Although the use of individual estimates of head motion, or group-level correlation of motion and functional connectivity has been suggested, a sufficiently sensitive measure of individual functional connectivity quality has not yet been established. We propose a new intuitive summary index, Typicality of Functional Connectivity, to capture deviations from standard brain functional connectivity patterns. In a resting-state fMRI dataset of 245 healthy subjects, this measure was significantly correlated with individual head motion metrics. The results were further robustly reproduced across atlas granularity, preprocessing options, and other datasets, including 1,081 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. In principle, Typicality of Functional Connectivity should be sensitive also to other types of artifacts, processing errors, and possibly also brain pathology, allowing extensive use in data quality screening and quantification in functional connectivity studies as well as methodological investigations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1611" target="_blank" >LO1611: Udržitelnost pro Národní ústav duševního zdraví</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Human Brain Mapping
ISSN
1065-9471
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
41
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
18
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
5325-5340
Kód UT WoS článku
000565321100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85090109459