Validation of the Human-Animal Interaction Scale (HAIS) in Czech Language
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F20%3A43920384" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/20:43920384 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60460709:41210/20:82325
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7485#cite" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7485#cite</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207485" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijerph17207485</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Validation of the Human-Animal Interaction Scale (HAIS) in Czech Language
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Human–Animal interaction (HAI) refers to any contact between humans and animals. Despite the lack of standardized measures of evaluation, one possible tool is the Human Animal Interaction Scale (HAIS). This study aimed to evaluate it in Czech language and to verify its use in clinical settings. One group of participants included 85 non-clinical volunteers; the second included 22 clinical participants, who were hospitalized in a long-term inpatient department All participants filled out the HAIS, the Companion Animal Bonding Scale (CABS) and the Companion Animal Semantic Di erential (CASD). The Czech HAIS achieved similarly good psychometric properties as the original scale. The Cronbach’s alpha showed strong internal consistency ( = 0.920) in the sample of volunteers, but low internal consistency ( = 0.656) in the group of clinical participants. In non-clinical volunteers, all scales and subscales correlated mutually at the p < 0.01 level. In the group of clinical participants, the CABS did not show significant correlations with other scales and subscales, nor was there a correlation of total HAIS score with the perceived rapport with animals. The findings of this study suggest that the Czech HAIS may be an e ective tool for evaluating HAI with non-clinical contingents, however careful modification is suggested before clinical use. One reason for this is the diculty in conducting some activities assessed by the scale in a clinical practice or hospital setting.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Validation of the Human-Animal Interaction Scale (HAIS) in Czech Language
Popis výsledku anglicky
Human–Animal interaction (HAI) refers to any contact between humans and animals. Despite the lack of standardized measures of evaluation, one possible tool is the Human Animal Interaction Scale (HAIS). This study aimed to evaluate it in Czech language and to verify its use in clinical settings. One group of participants included 85 non-clinical volunteers; the second included 22 clinical participants, who were hospitalized in a long-term inpatient department All participants filled out the HAIS, the Companion Animal Bonding Scale (CABS) and the Companion Animal Semantic Di erential (CASD). The Czech HAIS achieved similarly good psychometric properties as the original scale. The Cronbach’s alpha showed strong internal consistency ( = 0.920) in the sample of volunteers, but low internal consistency ( = 0.656) in the group of clinical participants. In non-clinical volunteers, all scales and subscales correlated mutually at the p < 0.01 level. In the group of clinical participants, the CABS did not show significant correlations with other scales and subscales, nor was there a correlation of total HAIS score with the perceived rapport with animals. The findings of this study suggest that the Czech HAIS may be an e ective tool for evaluating HAI with non-clinical contingents, however careful modification is suggested before clinical use. One reason for this is the diculty in conducting some activities assessed by the scale in a clinical practice or hospital setting.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30304 - Public and environmental health
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1611" target="_blank" >LO1611: Udržitelnost pro Národní ústav duševního zdraví</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ISSN
1660-4601
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
17
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
20
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
7485
Kód UT WoS článku
000585699200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85093911019