Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Reliability and Validity of the Czech Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients with Sleep Disorders and Healthy Controls

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F21%3A43920633" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/21:43920633 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11120/21:43921901 RIV/00216208:11110/21:10430287 RIV/00064165:_____/21:10430287 RIV/00216208:11310/21:10430287

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2021/5576348/" target="_blank" >https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2021/5576348/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5576348" target="_blank" >10.1155/2021/5576348</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Reliability and Validity of the Czech Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients with Sleep Disorders and Healthy Controls

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Objectives: Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-CZ) have been evaluated only in patients with chronic insomnia and thus it is unclear whether PSQI-CZ is suitable for use in other clinical and non-clinical populations. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the PSQI-CZ and to assess whether the unidimensional or multidimensional scoring of the instrument would be recommended. Methods: A total of 524 adult subjects from the Czech population participated in the study. The internal consistency of PSQI was evaluated using Cronbach&apos;s alpha. The known-group validity was tested using the Kruskal-Wallis H test to verify the difference between patients with sleep disorders and healthy control sample. For testing the structural validity, a cross-validation approach was used with both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For EFA, the maximum likelihood method with direct oblimin rotation and parallel analysis was used. Results: The internal consistency of PSQI-CZ items was moderate (α=0.75). Receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis showed high specificity (0.79) and moderate sensitivity (0.64) using an optimal cut-off score of 10. The EFA revealed a 3-factor structure with factors labelled as &quot;Sleep Duration and Efficiency&quot;, &quot;Sleep Disturbances and Quality&quot;, and &quot;Sleep Latency&quot;. The CFA showed that the emerged 3-factor model had a partly acceptable fit, which was better than other previously supported models. Conclusions: A high cut-off score of 10 is recommended to define poor sleep quality. Given the inconsistency of structural analyses, alternative scoring was not recommended. However, the individual components in addition to a total score should be interpreted when assessing sleep quality. We recommend editing and verifying the PSQI-CZ translation.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Reliability and Validity of the Czech Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients with Sleep Disorders and Healthy Controls

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Objectives: Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-CZ) have been evaluated only in patients with chronic insomnia and thus it is unclear whether PSQI-CZ is suitable for use in other clinical and non-clinical populations. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the PSQI-CZ and to assess whether the unidimensional or multidimensional scoring of the instrument would be recommended. Methods: A total of 524 adult subjects from the Czech population participated in the study. The internal consistency of PSQI was evaluated using Cronbach&apos;s alpha. The known-group validity was tested using the Kruskal-Wallis H test to verify the difference between patients with sleep disorders and healthy control sample. For testing the structural validity, a cross-validation approach was used with both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For EFA, the maximum likelihood method with direct oblimin rotation and parallel analysis was used. Results: The internal consistency of PSQI-CZ items was moderate (α=0.75). Receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis showed high specificity (0.79) and moderate sensitivity (0.64) using an optimal cut-off score of 10. The EFA revealed a 3-factor structure with factors labelled as &quot;Sleep Duration and Efficiency&quot;, &quot;Sleep Disturbances and Quality&quot;, and &quot;Sleep Latency&quot;. The CFA showed that the emerged 3-factor model had a partly acceptable fit, which was better than other previously supported models. Conclusions: A high cut-off score of 10 is recommended to define poor sleep quality. Given the inconsistency of structural analyses, alternative scoring was not recommended. However, the individual components in addition to a total score should be interpreted when assessing sleep quality. We recommend editing and verifying the PSQI-CZ translation.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/NV18-07-00272" target="_blank" >NV18-07-00272: Změny spánku a mozku ve vztahu ke zhoršení paměti u mírné kognitivní poruchy</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    BioMed Research International

  • ISSN

    2314-6133

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    2021

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    "Article ID 5576348"

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    1-9

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000687471700001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85113806326