Comparison of two types eye lens dosemeters used in interventional cardiology and radiology

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023884%3A_____%2F22%3A00009427" target="_blank" >RIV/00023884:_____/22:00009427 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-abstract/198/9-11/580/6673016?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=true" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-abstract/198/9-11/580/6673016?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=true</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac101" target="_blank" >10.1093/rpd/ncac101</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of two types eye lens dosemeters used in interventional cardiology and radiology

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this contribution is to provide an overview of comparison of two types of eye lens dosemeter systems. The comparison was performed at the Department of Intravenous Cardiology using patient and physician phantoms and supplemented by dose simulation using the Monte Carlo method. The tests were performed in several specific geometries and in addition to eye lens dosemeters the value of a personal dosemeter located at the reference point was also monitored. The value of H-p(3) and H-p(10) was monitored. It is clear from the results that film dosemeters achieve more correct results in most cases. It is probably due to a better correction for the angle of exposure. This assumption must be verified by more detailed measurements in laboratory conditions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of two types eye lens dosemeters used in interventional cardiology and radiology

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this contribution is to provide an overview of comparison of two types of eye lens dosemeter systems. The comparison was performed at the Department of Intravenous Cardiology using patient and physician phantoms and supplemented by dose simulation using the Monte Carlo method. The tests were performed in several specific geometries and in addition to eye lens dosemeters the value of a personal dosemeter located at the reference point was also monitored. The value of H-p(3) and H-p(10) was monitored. It is clear from the results that film dosemeters achieve more correct results in most cases. It is probably due to a better correction for the angle of exposure. This assumption must be verified by more detailed measurements in laboratory conditions.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20602 - Medical laboratory technology (including laboratory samples analysis; diagnostic technologies) (Biomaterials to be 2.9 [physical characteristics of living material as related to medical implants, devices, sensors])

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

ISSN

1742-3406

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

198

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9-11

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

580-585

Kód UT WoS článku

000844405700015

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85137124350