Trauma associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on autopsy reports after the 2015 ERC guidelines

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023884%3A_____%2F22%3A00009512" target="_blank" >RIV/00023884:_____/22:00009512 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064173:_____/22:43923823 RIV/00064165:_____/22:10446523 RIV/00216208:11110/22:10446523 RIV/00216208:11120/22:43923823 RIV/27283933:_____/22:00011110

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36057213/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36057213/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.034" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.034</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Trauma associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on autopsy reports after the 2015 ERC guidelines

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Abstract Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-related injuries have not been assessed since the 2015 Resuscitation Guidelines were established. Aim: To describe the incidence and severity of CPR-related injuries, and to evaluate the impact of the 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines on the objective assessment of injuries. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed autopsy reports of patients who underwent CPR. The most severe injuries were objectively assessed using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and all injuries were summarized according to the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). Results: Among 628 autopsy reports analyzed, patient characteristics and case details were distributed as follows: male sex, 71.1%; median age, 67 years; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 89.2%; bystander CPR, 56.8%. CPR-related injuries included: rib(s) 94.6%; lung(s), 9.9%; sternum, 62.4%; liver, 2.5%; and spleen, 1.8%. The incidence of bystander-provided CPR and severity of injury were similar to CPR provided only by professionals. There were no difference between mechanical and manual compressions. Females were older (p = 0.0001) and, although the frequency of their injuries was similar to males, they were significantly more severe (p = 0.01). Patients with life-threatening injury exhibited a baseline profile similar to those without injury . The median score (according to AIS) of the most severe injury was 3 and the median of summary of injuries was 13 according to the NISS-low risk of fatal injury. Conclusion: CPR-related injuries occurred frequently, although those that were life-threatening accounted for only 3% of cases. There were no differences between patients who were resuscitated by bystander(s) or by professionals and no differences between mechanical chest devices or manual resuscitation. Compared with a study based on the 2010 guidelines, similar injuries were found, but with more rib fractures, less visceral organ damage, and fewer life-threatening injuries.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Trauma associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on autopsy reports after the 2015 ERC guidelines

Popis výsledku anglicky

Abstract Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-related injuries have not been assessed since the 2015 Resuscitation Guidelines were established. Aim: To describe the incidence and severity of CPR-related injuries, and to evaluate the impact of the 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines on the objective assessment of injuries. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed autopsy reports of patients who underwent CPR. The most severe injuries were objectively assessed using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and all injuries were summarized according to the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). Results: Among 628 autopsy reports analyzed, patient characteristics and case details were distributed as follows: male sex, 71.1%; median age, 67 years; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 89.2%; bystander CPR, 56.8%. CPR-related injuries included: rib(s) 94.6%; lung(s), 9.9%; sternum, 62.4%; liver, 2.5%; and spleen, 1.8%. The incidence of bystander-provided CPR and severity of injury were similar to CPR provided only by professionals. There were no difference between mechanical and manual compressions. Females were older (p = 0.0001) and, although the frequency of their injuries was similar to males, they were significantly more severe (p = 0.01). Patients with life-threatening injury exhibited a baseline profile similar to those without injury . The median score (according to AIS) of the most severe injury was 3 and the median of summary of injuries was 13 according to the NISS-low risk of fatal injury. Conclusion: CPR-related injuries occurred frequently, although those that were life-threatening accounted for only 3% of cases. There were no differences between patients who were resuscitated by bystander(s) or by professionals and no differences between mechanical chest devices or manual resuscitation. Compared with a study based on the 2010 guidelines, similar injuries were found, but with more rib fractures, less visceral organ damage, and fewer life-threatening injuries.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

American Journal of Emergency Medicine

ISSN

0735-6757

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

61

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Novermber

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

81-86

Kód UT WoS článku

000922743900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85137105312