Intercomparison of multi‑GNSS signals characteristics acquired by a low‑cost receiver connected to various low‑cost antennas
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00025615%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000002" target="_blank" >RIV/00025615:_____/24:N0000002 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216305:26110/24:PU151086
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Intercomparison of multi‑GNSS signals characteristics acquired by a low‑cost receiver connected to various low‑cost antennas
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
With the increasing number of low-cost GNSS antennas available on the market, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis and intercomparison of their performance. Moreover, multi-GNSS observation noises are not well recognized for low-cost receivers. This study characterizes the quality of GNSS signals acquired by low-cost GNSS receivers equipped with eight types of antennas in terms of signal acquisition, multipath error and receiver noise. The diferences between various types of low-cost antennas are non-negligible, with helical antennas underperforming in every respect. Compared with a geodeticgrade station, GPS and Galileo signals acquired by low-cost receivers are typically weaker by 3–9 dB-Hz. While the L1, E1 and E5b signals are well-tracked, only 72% and 86% of L2 signals are acquired for GPS and GLONASS, respectively. The signal noise for pseudoranges varies from 0.12 m for Galileo E5b to over 0.30 m for GLONASS L1 and L2, whereas for carrier-phase observations it oscillates around 1 mm for both GPS and Galileo frequencies, but exceeds 3 mm for both GLONASS frequencies. Antenna phase center ofsets (PCOs) vary signifcantly between frequencies and constellations, and do not agree between two antennas of the same type by up to 25 mm in the vertical component. After a feld calibration a of low-cost antenna and consistent application of PCOs, the horizontal and vertical accuracy is improved to a few millimeter and a few centimeter level for the multi-GNSS processing with double-diferenced and undiferenced approach, respectively. Last but not least, we demonstrate that PPP-AR is possible also with low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas, and improves the precision and convergence time. The results prove that selection of low-cost antenna for a low-cost GNSS receiver is of great importance in precise positioning applications.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Intercomparison of multi‑GNSS signals characteristics acquired by a low‑cost receiver connected to various low‑cost antennas
Popis výsledku anglicky
With the increasing number of low-cost GNSS antennas available on the market, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis and intercomparison of their performance. Moreover, multi-GNSS observation noises are not well recognized for low-cost receivers. This study characterizes the quality of GNSS signals acquired by low-cost GNSS receivers equipped with eight types of antennas in terms of signal acquisition, multipath error and receiver noise. The diferences between various types of low-cost antennas are non-negligible, with helical antennas underperforming in every respect. Compared with a geodeticgrade station, GPS and Galileo signals acquired by low-cost receivers are typically weaker by 3–9 dB-Hz. While the L1, E1 and E5b signals are well-tracked, only 72% and 86% of L2 signals are acquired for GPS and GLONASS, respectively. The signal noise for pseudoranges varies from 0.12 m for Galileo E5b to over 0.30 m for GLONASS L1 and L2, whereas for carrier-phase observations it oscillates around 1 mm for both GPS and Galileo frequencies, but exceeds 3 mm for both GLONASS frequencies. Antenna phase center ofsets (PCOs) vary signifcantly between frequencies and constellations, and do not agree between two antennas of the same type by up to 25 mm in the vertical component. After a feld calibration a of low-cost antenna and consistent application of PCOs, the horizontal and vertical accuracy is improved to a few millimeter and a few centimeter level for the multi-GNSS processing with double-diferenced and undiferenced approach, respectively. Last but not least, we demonstrate that PPP-AR is possible also with low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas, and improves the precision and convergence time. The results prove that selection of low-cost antenna for a low-cost GNSS receiver is of great importance in precise positioning applications.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
GPS Solutions
ISSN
1080-5370
e-ISSN
1521-1886
Svazek periodika
28
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
Artickle number. 97
Kód UT WoS článku
001177572100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85189788447