Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Crustal melting vs. fractionation of basaltic magmas: Part 1, Granites and paradigms

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00025798%3A_____%2F21%3A00000105" target="_blank" >RIV/00025798:_____/21:00000105 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11310/21:10436579

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Crustal melting vs. fractionation of basaltic magmas: Part 1, Granites and paradigms

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Granitoids are a major component of the continental crust. They play a pivotal role in its evolution, either by adding new material (continental growth), or by reworking older continental crust. These two roles correspond to two main ways of forming granitic magmas, either by partial melting of pre-existing crustal rocks yielding granitic melts directly, or by fractionation of mantle-derived mafic to intermediate magmas. Both models represent endmembers, or paradigms that have shaped the way the geological community envisions granitoids, their occurrence, features, formation and meaning for crustal evolution and differentiation of the whole planet.In this paper, we expose the two competing paradigms and their implications. We explore the evidence on which each model is based, and how each school of thought articulates a comprehensive view of granitic magmatism based on field geological, petrological, geochemical (including isotopes) and physical constraints; and how, in turn, each view shapes the thinking on crustal growth and evolution, and the interpretation of proxies such as age and Hf isotopic patterns in detrital zircon databases. We emphasize that both schools of thought build a different, but internally consistent view based on a large body of evidence, and we propose that each of them is or has been relevant to some portions of the Earth. Thus, the key question is not so much 'which' model applies, but 'where, when and to which extent'.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Crustal melting vs. fractionation of basaltic magmas: Part 1, Granites and paradigms

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Granitoids are a major component of the continental crust. They play a pivotal role in its evolution, either by adding new material (continental growth), or by reworking older continental crust. These two roles correspond to two main ways of forming granitic magmas, either by partial melting of pre-existing crustal rocks yielding granitic melts directly, or by fractionation of mantle-derived mafic to intermediate magmas. Both models represent endmembers, or paradigms that have shaped the way the geological community envisions granitoids, their occurrence, features, formation and meaning for crustal evolution and differentiation of the whole planet.In this paper, we expose the two competing paradigms and their implications. We explore the evidence on which each model is based, and how each school of thought articulates a comprehensive view of granitic magmatism based on field geological, petrological, geochemical (including isotopes) and physical constraints; and how, in turn, each view shapes the thinking on crustal growth and evolution, and the interpretation of proxies such as age and Hf isotopic patterns in detrital zircon databases. We emphasize that both schools of thought build a different, but internally consistent view based on a large body of evidence, and we propose that each of them is or has been relevant to some portions of the Earth. Thus, the key question is not so much 'which' model applies, but 'where, when and to which extent'.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10505 - Geology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA18-24378S" target="_blank" >GA18-24378S: Petrogeneze (ultra-)draselných magmat evropských Variscid – implikace pro vývoj kolizních orogenů a modely krustálního růstu</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Lithos

  • ISSN

    0024-4937

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    402-403

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    November : 106291

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    nestránkováno

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000713001800009

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85109087584