AN EXAMINATION OF PLATINUM-GROUP ELEMENT THIOSPINELS
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00025798%3A_____%2F23%3A10169095" target="_blank" >RIV/00025798:_____/23:10169095 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3749/2300037" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3749/2300037</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3749/2300037" target="_blank" >10.3749/2300037</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
AN EXAMINATION OF PLATINUM-GROUP ELEMENT THIOSPINELS
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A review and discussion of platinum -group element thiospinels is presented, the context of which is a proposal accepted by the Commission of New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classi fi cation (voting proposal 17-H) made for the rede fi nition of cuproiridsite (ideally CuIr 2 S 4 ), cuprorhodsite (ideally CuRh 2 S 4 ), and malanite (ideally CuPt 2 S 4 ), along with the discreditation of ferrorhodsite (ideally FeRh 2 S 4 ) by Bosi et al . (2019). We review the literature in the context of the broader proposals by Bosi et al . (2019), highlight errors within them to conclude that all four proposals for rede fi nition and discreditation should have been rejected if the full facts had been consulted and IMA-established guidelines had been adhered to. It is agreed that dayingite should remain as a discredited mineral, while xingzhongite , rede fi ned by Bosi et al. (2019) as Pb 2 & thorn; Ir 3 & thorn; 2 S 4 , is argued to be of questionable status and should be considered for discreditation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
AN EXAMINATION OF PLATINUM-GROUP ELEMENT THIOSPINELS
Popis výsledku anglicky
A review and discussion of platinum -group element thiospinels is presented, the context of which is a proposal accepted by the Commission of New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classi fi cation (voting proposal 17-H) made for the rede fi nition of cuproiridsite (ideally CuIr 2 S 4 ), cuprorhodsite (ideally CuRh 2 S 4 ), and malanite (ideally CuPt 2 S 4 ), along with the discreditation of ferrorhodsite (ideally FeRh 2 S 4 ) by Bosi et al . (2019). We review the literature in the context of the broader proposals by Bosi et al . (2019), highlight errors within them to conclude that all four proposals for rede fi nition and discreditation should have been rejected if the full facts had been consulted and IMA-established guidelines had been adhered to. It is agreed that dayingite should remain as a discredited mineral, while xingzhongite , rede fi ned by Bosi et al. (2019) as Pb 2 & thorn; Ir 3 & thorn; 2 S 4 , is argued to be of questionable status and should be considered for discreditation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10504 - Mineralogy
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA22-26485S" target="_blank" >GA22-26485S: Syntetické minerály skupiny Pt-kovů a jejich využití</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY
ISSN
2817-1713
e-ISSN
2817-1713
Svazek periodika
61
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
CA - Kanada
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
1109-1121
Kód UT WoS článku
001239205100004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85195053924