Metoda vzorkování a laboratorní extrakce ovlivňují interpretaci rozsahu infestace obilí skladištními škůdci.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027006%3A_____%2F08%3A00000196" target="_blank" >RIV/00027006:_____/08:00000196 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

European-Union countries undergo the process of unifying laws. This is also true for protocols designated for monitoring and evaluation of pests and pesticide risks. This study was aimed at exploring whether different methods of sampling and extracting pests would lead to different pest population estimation. We compared two methods of sampling (surface sampling with cup-sampler vs. subsurface sampling with spear-sampler) and two methods of pests' extraction from samples (automated sieving vs. Tullgrenapparatus) taken from a highly pest infested flat grain store. Overall eight species of mites, seven species of beetles and two species of psocids were identified. The pest population density ranged between 0-12 individuals per sample (200 g) in psocids,0-14 in beetles and 2-25060 in mites. Surface sampling with cup-sampler was significantly more effective than sampling using subsurface spear-sampler. The number of trapped species was influenced neither by sampling nor by extracting met

Název v anglickém jazyce

Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests

Popis výsledku anglicky

European-Union countries undergo the process of unifying laws. This is also true for protocols designated for monitoring and evaluation of pests and pesticide risks. This study was aimed at exploring whether different methods of sampling and extracting pests would lead to different pest population estimation. We compared two methods of sampling (surface sampling with cup-sampler vs. subsurface sampling with spear-sampler) and two methods of pests' extraction from samples (automated sieving vs. Tullgrenapparatus) taken from a highly pest infested flat grain store. Overall eight species of mites, seven species of beetles and two species of psocids were identified. The pest population density ranged between 0-12 individuals per sample (200 g) in psocids,0-14 in beetles and 2-25060 in mites. Surface sampling with cup-sampler was significantly more effective than sampling using subsurface spear-sampler. The number of trapped species was influenced neither by sampling nor by extracting met

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GF - Choroby, škůdci, plevely a ochrana rostlin

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/QF4071" target="_blank" >QF4071: Komplexní metoda monitorování a detekce kontaminace skladovaných obilovin a cereálních produktů škůdci pomocí fyzikálně-chemických, imunochemických a molekulárních technik.</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

ISSN

1861-3829

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

115

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000257959200006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—