Human Perception of Vocalizations of Domestic Piglets and Modulation by Experience With Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027014%3A_____%2F10%3A%230001164" target="_blank" >RIV/00027014:_____/10:#0001164 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Human Perception of Vocalizations of Domestic Piglets and Modulation by Experience With Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We studied how humans with differing experience with pigs interpret pig vocalizations. Forty-eight ethologists studying pigs, 31 pig-caretakers and 54 naive students evaluated the emotional intensity and valence (negative/positive) of recordings from twonegative (castration, isolation) and two positive (reunion with the sow, post-suckling) contexts. They also identified the context in which the recordings were made. Castration vocalizations were evaluated as highly intense and unpleasant. The positivecontexts were evaluated as low in intensity and positive in valence. Pig-caretakers evaluated the intensity of vocalizations as lower, and ethologists evaluated the valence as more negative. Successful classification exceeded chance for all four contexts, especially for castration. Ethologists achieved better recognition than students. Humans are able to classify and understand emotional content of pig vocalizations but this ability varies with an individual?s experience with pigs.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Human Perception of Vocalizations of Domestic Piglets and Modulation by Experience With Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa)

Popis výsledku anglicky

We studied how humans with differing experience with pigs interpret pig vocalizations. Forty-eight ethologists studying pigs, 31 pig-caretakers and 54 naive students evaluated the emotional intensity and valence (negative/positive) of recordings from twonegative (castration, isolation) and two positive (reunion with the sow, post-suckling) contexts. They also identified the context in which the recordings were made. Castration vocalizations were evaluated as highly intense and unpleasant. The positivecontexts were evaluated as low in intensity and positive in valence. Pig-caretakers evaluated the intensity of vocalizations as lower, and ethologists evaluated the valence as more negative. Successful classification exceeded chance for all four contexts, especially for castration. Ethologists achieved better recognition than students. Humans are able to classify and understand emotional content of pig vocalizations but this ability varies with an individual?s experience with pigs.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GG - Chov hospodářských zvířat

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Comparative Psychology

ISSN

0735-7036

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

124

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000275389300008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—