Spatiotemporal differences in tree spatial patterns between alluvial hardwood and mountain fir?beech forests: do characteristic patterns exist?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027073%3A_____%2F13%3A%230001515" target="_blank" >RIV/00027073:_____/13:#0001515 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.12018/full" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.12018/full</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12018" target="_blank" >10.1111/jvs.12018</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Spatiotemporal differences in tree spatial patterns between alluvial hardwood and mountain fir?beech forests: do characteristic patterns exist?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Questions: What are the differences between the tree spatial patterns (TSP) of various recruit and mortality waves in alluvial hardwood forests and mountain fir?beech forests? Are there any statistically significant differences between the mean TSP of these forest types? Are these differences stable over time? Location: Alluvial floodplain forests at the confluence of the Morava and Dyje rivers, and mountain fir?beech forests in the OuterWestern Carpathians, Czech Republic. Methods: In both forest types, seven 2-ha rectangular plots were analysed. The pair correlation function g(r) was used to describe tree density variability of trees with DBH>=10 cm. The analyses were carried out for data sets fromthe 1970s, 1990s and 2000s. A bootstrap method was used to test for significant differences between themean values of g(r) fromalluvial forests and fromfir?beech forests. Results: Recruits inmountain fir?beech forests revealed consistent clustering to at least 5 m. In alluvial hardwood fore

Název v anglickém jazyce

Spatiotemporal differences in tree spatial patterns between alluvial hardwood and mountain fir?beech forests: do characteristic patterns exist?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Questions: What are the differences between the tree spatial patterns (TSP) of various recruit and mortality waves in alluvial hardwood forests and mountain fir?beech forests? Are there any statistically significant differences between the mean TSP of these forest types? Are these differences stable over time? Location: Alluvial floodplain forests at the confluence of the Morava and Dyje rivers, and mountain fir?beech forests in the OuterWestern Carpathians, Czech Republic. Methods: In both forest types, seven 2-ha rectangular plots were analysed. The pair correlation function g(r) was used to describe tree density variability of trees with DBH>=10 cm. The analyses were carried out for data sets fromthe 1970s, 1990s and 2000s. A bootstrap method was used to test for significant differences between themean values of g(r) fromalluvial forests and fromfir?beech forests. Results: Recruits inmountain fir?beech forests revealed consistent clustering to at least 5 m. In alluvial hardwood fore

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GK - Lesnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP504%2F11%2F2301" target="_blank" >GAP504/11/2301: Dynamika prostorového uspořádání stromů v přírodě blízkých temperátních lesích</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Vegetation Science

ISSN

1100-9233

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

1141-1153

Kód UT WoS článku

000325370200018

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—