Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Cobb-Douglas or Translog Production Function in Efficiency Analysis?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027251%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000019" target="_blank" >RIV/00027251:_____/20:N0000019 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://mme2020.mendelu.cz/wcd/w-rek-mme/mme2020_conference_proceedings_final_final.pdf" target="_blank" >https://mme2020.mendelu.cz/wcd/w-rek-mme/mme2020_conference_proceedings_final_final.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Cobb-Douglas or Translog Production Function in Efficiency Analysis?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The aim of this paper is to assess two types of specification of production function when estimating the technical efficiency with Stochastic Frontier Analysis – Cobb-Douglas (CD) and translog (TL) production functions and their influence on the results. CD production function is easy to be estimated. It is a special case in a more general class of production functions with constant elasticity of substitution, where is the mostly used a TL function. We compared both specifications on the unbalanced panel data of agricultural holdings in the Czech Republic. There were 517 farms and 1708 observations for years 2013 to 2016. Accounting data were taken from Albertina database purchased from Bisnode, s. r. o., company and data about acreage were taken from Land Parcel Identification System. Production was approximated by sales, production factors were: consumption of material and energy, fixed assets, number of employees and acreage of agricultural land. Technical efficiencies were calculated by JLMS (Jondrow, Lovell, Materov, Schmidt, 1982 [11]) method and their differences tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and correlated by Spearman’s rank coefficient. The technical efficiency in CD specification was slightly higher (85.69%) than in TL specification (85.12%), but there were found statistically significant differences. Spearman’s ???? = 0.9597 was close to 1 pointing on high positive dependence. Using likelihood ratio test, the CD specification was rejected in favor of more general specification of TL function. We can conclude that TL function is more appropriate to be used as a production function in SFA, but the effect on the technical efficiency is mild and almost negligible (despite that the test revealed statistically significant differences, the dependence was very high.)

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Cobb-Douglas or Translog Production Function in Efficiency Analysis?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The aim of this paper is to assess two types of specification of production function when estimating the technical efficiency with Stochastic Frontier Analysis – Cobb-Douglas (CD) and translog (TL) production functions and their influence on the results. CD production function is easy to be estimated. It is a special case in a more general class of production functions with constant elasticity of substitution, where is the mostly used a TL function. We compared both specifications on the unbalanced panel data of agricultural holdings in the Czech Republic. There were 517 farms and 1708 observations for years 2013 to 2016. Accounting data were taken from Albertina database purchased from Bisnode, s. r. o., company and data about acreage were taken from Land Parcel Identification System. Production was approximated by sales, production factors were: consumption of material and energy, fixed assets, number of employees and acreage of agricultural land. Technical efficiencies were calculated by JLMS (Jondrow, Lovell, Materov, Schmidt, 1982 [11]) method and their differences tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and correlated by Spearman’s rank coefficient. The technical efficiency in CD specification was slightly higher (85.69%) than in TL specification (85.12%), but there were found statistically significant differences. Spearman’s ???? = 0.9597 was close to 1 pointing on high positive dependence. Using likelihood ratio test, the CD specification was rejected in favor of more general specification of TL function. We can conclude that TL function is more appropriate to be used as a production function in SFA, but the effect on the technical efficiency is mild and almost negligible (despite that the test revealed statistically significant differences, the dependence was very high.)

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    38th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics (MME 2020)

  • ISBN

    978-80-7509-734-7

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    557-563

  • Název nakladatele

    Mendel University Publishing Center, Brno

  • Místo vydání

    Brno

  • Místo konání akce

    Brno

  • Datum konání akce

    9. 9. 2020

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku