Who are Advisory Services Leaving Out? A Critical Reflection on ‘Hard to Reach’ Farmers
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027251%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/00027251:_____/22:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1746-692X.12347" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1746-692X.12347</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12347" target="_blank" >10.1111/1746-692X.12347</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Who are Advisory Services Leaving Out? A Critical Reflection on ‘Hard to Reach’ Farmers
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Although the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union has broadened its objectives to integrate social issues, several hard-to-reach groups of farmers and workers continue to be ignored by advisory services and associated policies. Connecting with these groups has a strong potential to increase the economic and social cohesion of European agricultures. We interviewed over 1,000 farmers across Europe and identified features of these groups that are often overlooked by advisory services. We critically reflected on the social cohorts omitted from advisory services and how they could be better reached; they include farm labourers, new entrants or ‘career changers’, and later adopters. We clarify the different types of advisors in the advisory landscape, distinguishing between those who are linked to or independent from sales of inputs or technologies. We make concrete recommendations about how to engage advisors with hard-to-reach groups, with approaches suited to different national contexts of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS); thus contributing to the ‘AKIS dimension of National Strategic Plans of the next Common Agricultural Policy, 2023–2027. We argue for the more effective use of advances in the social sciences through a better understanding of advice as social interaction which can bolster the inclusiveness of public policies.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Who are Advisory Services Leaving Out? A Critical Reflection on ‘Hard to Reach’ Farmers
Popis výsledku anglicky
Although the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union has broadened its objectives to integrate social issues, several hard-to-reach groups of farmers and workers continue to be ignored by advisory services and associated policies. Connecting with these groups has a strong potential to increase the economic and social cohesion of European agricultures. We interviewed over 1,000 farmers across Europe and identified features of these groups that are often overlooked by advisory services. We critically reflected on the social cohorts omitted from advisory services and how they could be better reached; they include farm labourers, new entrants or ‘career changers’, and later adopters. We clarify the different types of advisors in the advisory landscape, distinguishing between those who are linked to or independent from sales of inputs or technologies. We make concrete recommendations about how to engage advisors with hard-to-reach groups, with approaches suited to different national contexts of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS); thus contributing to the ‘AKIS dimension of National Strategic Plans of the next Common Agricultural Policy, 2023–2027. We argue for the more effective use of advances in the social sciences through a better understanding of advice as social interaction which can bolster the inclusiveness of public policies.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50803 - Information science (social aspects)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
EuroChoices
ISSN
1478-0917
e-ISSN
1746-692X
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
50-55
Kód UT WoS článku
000814981400009
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—