Effect of systemic enzymotherapy on Cesarean section scar healing
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F16%3A10329308" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/16:10329308 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11110/16:10329308
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.prolekare.cz/linkout/59622" target="_blank" >http://www.prolekare.cz/linkout/59622</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Effect of systemic enzymotherapy on Cesarean section scar healing
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objectives: The aim of our study was to monitor changes in the healing of Caesarean section scars in patients using systemic enzymotherapy in comparison with patients not treated with systemic enzymotherapy (Wobenzym). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 60 primiparous women delivered by CS. We compared the following outcomes: scar thickness after the Caesarean section, dehiscence risk coefficient (DRC), severity of the Caesarean section scar defect, uterine cavity dilation, post-operative pain, C-reactive protein level and febrility. Results: The scar thickness 6 weeks after CS was significantly greater in the group of patients taking Wobenzym (7.1+-0.9 mm; mean +- SD) than in the patients without Wobenzym (5.3+-0.7 mm) (p = 0.01). Severe Caesarean section scar defects were observed in 1/30 (3.3%) Wobenzym users and in 5/30 (16.7%) patients who did not use Wobenzym, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.195). Conclusion: Despite the percentage of patients with a severe CS scar defect being apparently lower in the group treated with Wobenzym, the difference did not reach statistical significance due to the small size of the study population.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Effect of systemic enzymotherapy on Cesarean section scar healing
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objectives: The aim of our study was to monitor changes in the healing of Caesarean section scars in patients using systemic enzymotherapy in comparison with patients not treated with systemic enzymotherapy (Wobenzym). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 60 primiparous women delivered by CS. We compared the following outcomes: scar thickness after the Caesarean section, dehiscence risk coefficient (DRC), severity of the Caesarean section scar defect, uterine cavity dilation, post-operative pain, C-reactive protein level and febrility. Results: The scar thickness 6 weeks after CS was significantly greater in the group of patients taking Wobenzym (7.1+-0.9 mm; mean +- SD) than in the patients without Wobenzym (5.3+-0.7 mm) (p = 0.01). Severe Caesarean section scar defects were observed in 1/30 (3.3%) Wobenzym users and in 5/30 (16.7%) patients who did not use Wobenzym, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.195). Conclusion: Despite the percentage of patients with a severe CS scar defect being apparently lower in the group treated with Wobenzym, the difference did not reach statistical significance due to the small size of the study population.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Česká gynekologie
ISSN
1210-7832
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
81
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
202-207
Kód UT WoS článku
000389361500007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85002626942