Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F16%3A10332225" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/16:10332225 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/16:10332225

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3076-7" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3076-7</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3076-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00192-016-3076-7</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This committee opinion paper summarizes available evidence about recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) to provide guidance on management. A working subcommittee from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Research and Development Committee was formed. The literature regarding recurrent POP was reviewed and summarized by individual members of the subcommittee. Recommendations were graded according to the 2009 Oxford Levels of Evidence. The summary was reviewed by the Committee. There is no agreed definition for recurrent POP and evidence in relation to its evaluation and management is limited. The assessment of recurrent POP should entail looking for possible reason(s) for failure, including persistent and/or new risk factors, detection of all pelvic floor defects and checking for complications of previous surgery. The management requires individual evaluation of the risks and benefits of different options and appropriate patient counseling. There is an urgent need for an agreed definition and further research into all aspects of recurrent POP.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion

Popis výsledku anglicky

This committee opinion paper summarizes available evidence about recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) to provide guidance on management. A working subcommittee from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Research and Development Committee was formed. The literature regarding recurrent POP was reviewed and summarized by individual members of the subcommittee. Recommendations were graded according to the 2009 Oxford Levels of Evidence. The summary was reviewed by the Committee. There is no agreed definition for recurrent POP and evidence in relation to its evaluation and management is limited. The assessment of recurrent POP should entail looking for possible reason(s) for failure, including persistent and/or new risk factors, detection of all pelvic floor defects and checking for complications of previous surgery. The management requires individual evaluation of the risks and benefits of different options and appropriate patient counseling. There is an urgent need for an agreed definition and further research into all aspects of recurrent POP.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Urogynecology Journal

ISSN

0937-3462

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

27

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

1619-1632

Kód UT WoS článku

000386353100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84977119077