Branched crural bypass has no advantage over simple crural bypass in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F17%3A10363960" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/17:10363960 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11110/17:10363960
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.ijcem.com/files/ijcem0046290.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.ijcem.com/files/ijcem0046290.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Branched crural bypass has no advantage over simple crural bypass in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This retrospective study compared mid-term outcome of a simple crural bypass (SCB, n= 72) and branched crural bypass (BCB, n= 23) constructed with reverse or in situ saphenous grafts or prosthetic grafts in patients with peripheral arterial disease grade III to IV (Fontaine classification) and type D lesions (TASC II classification). Life table analysis showed comparable primary (P=0.83), assisted (P=0.76), and secondary patency rates (P=0.78), limb salvage rates (P=0.64), and survival rates (P=0.81) between BCB and SCB. Comparison between the saphenous vein grafts and prosthetic grafts showed better primary (P=0.0089), assisted (P=0.0013), and secondary patency rates (P=0.0089) where venous grafts were used, but not limb salvage rates (P=.072). In the SCB group, anastomoses to the anterior tibial artery had worse primary (P=0.023), assisted (P=0.035), and secondary (P=0.042) patency rates, but comparable limb salvage rates(P=0.57). We conclude that BCB provides no advantage but also no additional risk for the patient. When choosing a target crural artery, evidence shows the posterior tibial artery or fibular artery should be preferred to the anterior tibial artery.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Branched crural bypass has no advantage over simple crural bypass in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease
Popis výsledku anglicky
This retrospective study compared mid-term outcome of a simple crural bypass (SCB, n= 72) and branched crural bypass (BCB, n= 23) constructed with reverse or in situ saphenous grafts or prosthetic grafts in patients with peripheral arterial disease grade III to IV (Fontaine classification) and type D lesions (TASC II classification). Life table analysis showed comparable primary (P=0.83), assisted (P=0.76), and secondary patency rates (P=0.78), limb salvage rates (P=0.64), and survival rates (P=0.81) between BCB and SCB. Comparison between the saphenous vein grafts and prosthetic grafts showed better primary (P=0.0089), assisted (P=0.0013), and secondary patency rates (P=0.0089) where venous grafts were used, but not limb salvage rates (P=.072). In the SCB group, anastomoses to the anterior tibial artery had worse primary (P=0.023), assisted (P=0.035), and secondary (P=0.042) patency rates, but comparable limb salvage rates(P=0.57). We conclude that BCB provides no advantage but also no additional risk for the patient. When choosing a target crural artery, evidence shows the posterior tibial artery or fibular artery should be preferred to the anterior tibial artery.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NV15-27941A" target="_blank" >NV15-27941A: Využití neantigenního rybího kolagenu při konstrukci implantátů a jako nosiče léků</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
ISSN
1940-5901
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
7859-7866
Kód UT WoS článku
000402294200054
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85019695268