Functional neurological disorder: a comparative analysis of experience of Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F24%3A10483166" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/24:10483166 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/24:10483166

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ET0y5Bhrvf" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ET0y5Bhrvf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/pjnns.99264" target="_blank" >10.5603/pjnns.99264</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Functional neurological disorder: a comparative analysis of experience of Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim of study. We aimed to compare knowledge, opinions, and clinical experiences among Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists to identify potential educational gaps and unify understanding. Clinical rationale for study. Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a disabling condition characterised by motor, sensory, or cognitive symptoms which are incompatible with other neurological disorders. Novel diagnostic and treatment approaches have improved FND management. However, the extent of their adoption, and any differences or similarities across European communities, remain to be established. Material and methods. Members of the Czech and Slovak Neurological Societies were invited via e-mail to participate in a 14-item web-based survey investigating their approach to FND. This data was compared to results from a previous study involving 492 Italian neurologists. Results. 232 questionnaires were completed by Czech and Slovak neurologists (CZ-SK). Similarities were found between CZ-SK and Italian neurologists in their preference for the term &apos;FND&apos; over other psychological-related terms and in explaining symptoms as due to abnormal functioning of the nervous system rather than attributing them to mental illness. However, only fewer than 5% in both groups thought that simulation was highly unlikely. Both groups reported relying on positive signs (e.g. inconsistency, distractibility) according to the current diagnostic criteria, but also a tendency to perform additional tests to exclude other causes. However, some differences were observed: Italian neurologists placed a greater emphasis on psychological factors including litigation. CZ-SK neurologists were more likely to suggest physiotherapy as a treatment option and to provide educational intervention for patients and their relatives. Conclusions. Overall, our findings suggest that although Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists have adopted some new developments in the field of FND, significant gaps still exist in their understanding and common practices regarding conceptualisation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical implications. Our results suggest that promoting knowledge through postgraduate curricula and teaching courses for neurologists is necessary to optimise patient management in various European countries.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Functional neurological disorder: a comparative analysis of experience of Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim of study. We aimed to compare knowledge, opinions, and clinical experiences among Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists to identify potential educational gaps and unify understanding. Clinical rationale for study. Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a disabling condition characterised by motor, sensory, or cognitive symptoms which are incompatible with other neurological disorders. Novel diagnostic and treatment approaches have improved FND management. However, the extent of their adoption, and any differences or similarities across European communities, remain to be established. Material and methods. Members of the Czech and Slovak Neurological Societies were invited via e-mail to participate in a 14-item web-based survey investigating their approach to FND. This data was compared to results from a previous study involving 492 Italian neurologists. Results. 232 questionnaires were completed by Czech and Slovak neurologists (CZ-SK). Similarities were found between CZ-SK and Italian neurologists in their preference for the term &apos;FND&apos; over other psychological-related terms and in explaining symptoms as due to abnormal functioning of the nervous system rather than attributing them to mental illness. However, only fewer than 5% in both groups thought that simulation was highly unlikely. Both groups reported relying on positive signs (e.g. inconsistency, distractibility) according to the current diagnostic criteria, but also a tendency to perform additional tests to exclude other causes. However, some differences were observed: Italian neurologists placed a greater emphasis on psychological factors including litigation. CZ-SK neurologists were more likely to suggest physiotherapy as a treatment option and to provide educational intervention for patients and their relatives. Conclusions. Overall, our findings suggest that although Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists have adopted some new developments in the field of FND, significant gaps still exist in their understanding and common practices regarding conceptualisation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical implications. Our results suggest that promoting knowledge through postgraduate curricula and teaching courses for neurologists is necessary to optimise patient management in various European countries.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

ISSN

0028-3843

e-ISSN

1897-4260

Svazek periodika

58

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

413-421

Kód UT WoS článku

001260136700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85202532085