The general public as well as physiotherapists evaluate spinal flexion as dangerous regardless of their own low back pain history
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F24%3A10487397" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/24:10487397 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11130/24:10487397 RIV/00064203:_____/24:10487397
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=h1459nsyUq" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=h1459nsyUq</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103216" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103216</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The general public as well as physiotherapists evaluate spinal flexion as dangerous regardless of their own low back pain history
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BACKGROUND: Maladaptive fear of movement in individuals with low back pain may be associated with worse clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To explore beliefs about the perceived dangers regarding different spinal postures within the Czech Republic. DESIGN: Exploratory cross-sectional study including physiotherapists and members of the general public. METHODS: Self-reported perceived safety/danger of "straight" and "flexed" spinal postures regarding 1) sitting, 2) lifting of light and 3) heavy object from the floor based on three pairs of photographs was measured using numeric rating scales (0-10, safe to dangerous) without any given context and in the context of low back pain. The sum of differences between the ratings of flexed and straight postures were used to calculate Bending Safety Beliefs Thermometer (BSB(Thermometer)) total score potentially ranging -60-60 (higher values indicates evaluation of flexed spinal postures as more dangerous in comparison to straight postures). RESULTS: 760 participants were included in the analysis. The mean BSB(Thermometer) total score was 31.1 (SD 16.1) and higher scores were positively associated with being women (b = 14.8, 95% CI [9.9-19.8]); non-medical profession (b = 24.7, 95% CI [15.2-34.2]); age (b = 0.38, 95% CI [0.16-0.6]; and their interactions. There was no significant association with current low back pain status or history of low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: On average, participants evaluated "flexed" spinal postures as significantly more dangerous when compared with "straight" spinal postures, with only subgroups of physiotherapists scoring lower than the general public. Clinically, these beliefs could be targeted by individualized education, exposure-based interventions and public campaigns; however, further research is required.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The general public as well as physiotherapists evaluate spinal flexion as dangerous regardless of their own low back pain history
Popis výsledku anglicky
BACKGROUND: Maladaptive fear of movement in individuals with low back pain may be associated with worse clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To explore beliefs about the perceived dangers regarding different spinal postures within the Czech Republic. DESIGN: Exploratory cross-sectional study including physiotherapists and members of the general public. METHODS: Self-reported perceived safety/danger of "straight" and "flexed" spinal postures regarding 1) sitting, 2) lifting of light and 3) heavy object from the floor based on three pairs of photographs was measured using numeric rating scales (0-10, safe to dangerous) without any given context and in the context of low back pain. The sum of differences between the ratings of flexed and straight postures were used to calculate Bending Safety Beliefs Thermometer (BSB(Thermometer)) total score potentially ranging -60-60 (higher values indicates evaluation of flexed spinal postures as more dangerous in comparison to straight postures). RESULTS: 760 participants were included in the analysis. The mean BSB(Thermometer) total score was 31.1 (SD 16.1) and higher scores were positively associated with being women (b = 14.8, 95% CI [9.9-19.8]); non-medical profession (b = 24.7, 95% CI [15.2-34.2]); age (b = 0.38, 95% CI [0.16-0.6]; and their interactions. There was no significant association with current low back pain status or history of low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: On average, participants evaluated "flexed" spinal postures as significantly more dangerous when compared with "straight" spinal postures, with only subgroups of physiotherapists scoring lower than the general public. Clinically, these beliefs could be targeted by individualized education, exposure-based interventions and public campaigns; however, further research is required.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30306 - Sport and fitness sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
ISSN
2468-7812
e-ISSN
2468-7812
Svazek periodika
74
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
November
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
103216
Kód UT WoS článku
001356780000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85208550752