Hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with cardiac arrest and shockable rhythm: a secondary analysis of the TTM-2 study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F24%3A10488316" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/24:10488316 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/24:10488316

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=pTIKOauOx_" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=pTIKOauOx_</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05119-3" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13054-024-05119-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with cardiac arrest and shockable rhythm: a secondary analysis of the TTM-2 study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether hypothermia increased survival and improved functional outcome when compared with normothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with similar characteristics than in previous randomized studies showing benefits for hypothermia. Methods: Post hoc analysis of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (TTM-2, NCT02908308). In this analysis, the subset of patients included in the trial who had similar characteristics to patients included in one previous randomized trial and randomized to hypothermia at 33 °C or normothermia (i.e. target &lt; 37.8 °C) were considered. The primary outcome was survival at 6 months; secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome at 6 months, defined as a modified Rankin scale of 0-3. Time-to-death and the occurrence of adverse events were also reported. Results: From a total of 1891 included in the TTM-2 study, 600 (31.7%) were included in the analysis, 294 in the hypothermia and 306 in the normothermia group. At 6 months, 207 of the 294 patients (70.4%) in the hypothermia group and 220 of the 306 patients (71.8%) in the normothermia group had survived (relative risk with hypothermia, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.15; P = 0.71). Also, 198 of the 294 (67.3%) in the hypothermia group and 202 of the 306 (66.0%) in the normothermia group had a favorable functional outcome (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.23; P = 0.79). There was a significant increase in the occurrence of arrythmias in the hypothermia group (62/294, 21.2%) when compared to the normothermia group (43/306, 14.1%-OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.14; p = 0.026). Conclusions: In this study, hypothermia at 33oC did not improve survival or functional outcome in a subset of patients with similar cardiac arrest characteristics to patients in whom benefit from hypothermia was shown in prior studies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with cardiac arrest and shockable rhythm: a secondary analysis of the TTM-2 study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether hypothermia increased survival and improved functional outcome when compared with normothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with similar characteristics than in previous randomized studies showing benefits for hypothermia. Methods: Post hoc analysis of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (TTM-2, NCT02908308). In this analysis, the subset of patients included in the trial who had similar characteristics to patients included in one previous randomized trial and randomized to hypothermia at 33 °C or normothermia (i.e. target &lt; 37.8 °C) were considered. The primary outcome was survival at 6 months; secondary outcomes included favorable functional outcome at 6 months, defined as a modified Rankin scale of 0-3. Time-to-death and the occurrence of adverse events were also reported. Results: From a total of 1891 included in the TTM-2 study, 600 (31.7%) were included in the analysis, 294 in the hypothermia and 306 in the normothermia group. At 6 months, 207 of the 294 patients (70.4%) in the hypothermia group and 220 of the 306 patients (71.8%) in the normothermia group had survived (relative risk with hypothermia, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.15; P = 0.71). Also, 198 of the 294 (67.3%) in the hypothermia group and 202 of the 306 (66.0%) in the normothermia group had a favorable functional outcome (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.23; P = 0.79). There was a significant increase in the occurrence of arrythmias in the hypothermia group (62/294, 21.2%) when compared to the normothermia group (43/306, 14.1%-OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.14; p = 0.026). Conclusions: In this study, hypothermia at 33oC did not improve survival or functional outcome in a subset of patients with similar cardiac arrest characteristics to patients in whom benefit from hypothermia was shown in prior studies.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Critical Care

ISSN

1364-8535

e-ISSN

1466-609X

Svazek periodika

28

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

335

Kód UT WoS článku

001333552900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85206470958